2017 13th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/telsks.2017.8246282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the usability of Bluetooth in V2I based communications for extended infrastructure support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the emergency situation caused by the Covid-19, and the mobility restrictions in which it has been necessary to work in the time planned for these tests, it was not possible to have a scenario where the range could be tested better, limiting these tests to the 300 meters available, enough for I2V applications [15]. In this type of applications, the typical payload goes from 240 bits [9] to a range between 256 and 1024 bits [8,15] (between 30 and 128 bytes). This represents no more than 128 bytes.…”
Section: Testbed and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the emergency situation caused by the Covid-19, and the mobility restrictions in which it has been necessary to work in the time planned for these tests, it was not possible to have a scenario where the range could be tested better, limiting these tests to the 300 meters available, enough for I2V applications [15]. In this type of applications, the typical payload goes from 240 bits [9] to a range between 256 and 1024 bits [8,15] (between 30 and 128 bytes). This represents no more than 128 bytes.…”
Section: Testbed and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with Bluetooth 5.0 the range of communications is much higher, and there are connectionless applications where it is not necessary to complete the process of establishing a connection, but only to disseminate information, which makes this technology feasible for this type of application [5] [6]. The use of Bluetooth Communications as an I2V communications network has been analyzed in different scenarios, using Bluetooth 4.0 and connection-based communication [8]. In [9], Bluetooth 4.0 and Zigbee are compared for this type of applications, highlighting the greater stability of Zigbee, although it is a much less widespread technology than Bluetooth, with a lower range and speed [10].…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of the first tests, presented in [12], was to evaluate the performance of the protocol with the improvements introduced in version 5.x and to test its effectiveness in open environments, as well as to study the capacity of the advertisement mode to send useful application-level messages based on recommendations (range of 240 and 1024 bits (from 30 to 128 bytes)) [18,19]. The performance of these tests gave verification of very acceptable PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio) percentages up to 250 m distance, although, in the case of large messages of the application layer, a high fragmentation of these means that at these distances it is not possible to recompose more than 6% of the messages, even with LE_CODED coding.…”
Section: Scenarios and Test Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike classic Bluetooth, the emergence of BLE, offering much wider communication range and the possibility of implementing information broadcasting applications (where it is not necessary to complete the process of establishing a connection pair), enables this technology in these types of applications [15,16]. From this point of view, the use of BLE as an I2V communication network has been analysed in different scenarios, using its 4.0 version but in a connection-based communication mode [18]. The work in [19] compares BLE 4.0 and Zigbee for this type of application, indicating the greater stability and robustness of Zigbee but highlighting that it is a much less widespread technology with a much shorter range and speed than BLE [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V2I communications mainly concern data exchange between smart vehicles and the infrastructure via wireless networks, in particular through standards such as IEEE 1609 WAVE and IEEE 802.11p, with objectives of safety and traffic efficiency. Different wireless solutions based on LTE have been explored [2], or even Bluetooth in [1]. Several articles are available in literature comparing LTE based solutions to IEEE 802.11p standard [2]- [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%