2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2014.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the upper bounds for the constants of the Hardy–Littlewood inequality

Abstract: Abstract. The best known upper estimates for the constants of the Hardy-Littlewood inequality for m-linear forms on ℓp spaces are of the form √ 2 m−1 . We present better estimates which depend on p and m. An interesting consequence is that if p ≥ m 2 then the constants have a subpolynomial growth as m tends to infinity.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for all m-linear forms T : ℓ n p × · · · × ℓ n p → K, all positive integers n. The optimal constants C K m,p , D K m,p are unknown; even the asymptotic behaviour of these constants is unknown. Up to now, the best estimates for C K m,p can be found in [3,4]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for all m-linear forms T : ℓ n p × · · · × ℓ n p → K, all positive integers n. The optimal constants C K m,p , D K m,p are unknown; even the asymptotic behaviour of these constants is unknown. Up to now, the best estimates for C K m,p can be found in [3,4]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for the optimal constants involved in Bohnenblust-Hille and Hardy-Littlewood inequalities was efficiently developed in the recent years and the best known constant have polynomial growth (see [10,15,16,18]). Kahane-Salem-Zygmund's inequality turns out to be a formidable (but not complete) tool to provide the optimal exponents on both inequalities (see [1,4,20]). Therefore, a question arises: "How efficient the Kahane-Salem-Zygmund is on providing optimal Bohnenblust-Hille or Hardy-Littlewood constants?…”
Section: Final Remark: Constants With Exponential Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case 0 ≤ 1 p ≤ 1 2 was more explored since it appearance. Several studies have made significant progress in the context 0 ≤ 1 p ≤ 1 2 (see for instance [2,3,5,6,8]). For example, among other results, it was proved in [5,8]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%