1998
DOI: 10.1006/jfan.1998.3277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Unitary Systems Affiliated with Orthonormal Wavelet Theory inn-Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of the present paper is to investigate the existence and uniqueness of symmetric approximations of frames (respectively, symmetric orthogonalizations of bases of Hilbert spaces) {f i } i∈N of Hilbert subspaces K ⊆ H. That means, we look for the existence and uniqueness of normalized tight frames (resp., orthonormal bases) {ν i } i∈N of Hilbert subspaces L ⊆ H such that the sum j∈N ν j − f j 2 is finite and admits the minimum of all finite sums j∈N µ j − f j 2 that might appear for any other normalized tight frame (resp., orthonormal basis) {µ i } i∈N of any other Hilbert subspace of H. We apply the approach of the third author to symmetric approximations of frames in Hilbert spaces by normalized tight frames. We can rely on fundamental work done by David R. Larson and his collaborators Xingde Dai, Deguang Han, E. J. Ionascu and C. M. Pearcy ( [10,13,16]), by A. Aldroubi [3], P. G. Casazza [4], O. Christensen [7,8,9] and J. R. Holub [14,15]. As a result we obtain that a symmetric approximation exists and is always unique if and only if the operator (P − |F |) is Hilbert-Schmidt, where (I − P ) denotes the projection to the kernel of |F |.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the present paper is to investigate the existence and uniqueness of symmetric approximations of frames (respectively, symmetric orthogonalizations of bases of Hilbert spaces) {f i } i∈N of Hilbert subspaces K ⊆ H. That means, we look for the existence and uniqueness of normalized tight frames (resp., orthonormal bases) {ν i } i∈N of Hilbert subspaces L ⊆ H such that the sum j∈N ν j − f j 2 is finite and admits the minimum of all finite sums j∈N µ j − f j 2 that might appear for any other normalized tight frame (resp., orthonormal basis) {µ i } i∈N of any other Hilbert subspace of H. We apply the approach of the third author to symmetric approximations of frames in Hilbert spaces by normalized tight frames. We can rely on fundamental work done by David R. Larson and his collaborators Xingde Dai, Deguang Han, E. J. Ionascu and C. M. Pearcy ( [10,13,16]), by A. Aldroubi [3], P. G. Casazza [4], O. Christensen [7,8,9] and J. R. Holub [14,15]. As a result we obtain that a symmetric approximation exists and is always unique if and only if the operator (P − |F |) is Hilbert-Schmidt, where (I − P ) denotes the projection to the kernel of |F |.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is easily worked out, and was shown in detail in [39] in the context of working out a complete theory of unitary equivalence of wavelet systems. Hence the wavelet theories are equivalent.…”
Section: The Expansive-dilation Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is easily worked out, and was shown in detail in [18] in the context of working out a complete theory of unitary equivalence of wavelet systems. Hence the wavelet theories are equivalent.…”
Section: One Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the original work was accomplished in the Ph.D. theses of Q. Gu and D. Speegle, when they were together finishing up at Texas A&M. Some significant additional work was accomplished by Speegle and also by others. In [18], with Ionascu and Pearcy we proved that if an nxn real invertible matrix A is not similar (in the nxn complex matrices) to a unitary matrix, then the corresponding dilation operator D A is in fact a bilateral shift of infinite multiplicity. If a dilation matrix were to admit any type of wavelet (or frame-wavelet) theory, then it is well-known that a necessary condition would be that the corresponding dilation operator would have to be a bilateral shift of infinite multiplicity.…”
Section: Non-expansive Dilationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation