2007
DOI: 10.1080/03605300600910241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Uniform Poincaré Inequality

Abstract: We give a proof of the Poincaré inequality in W 1,p (Ω) with a constant that is independent of Ω ∈ U, where U is a set of uniformly bounded and uniformly Lipschitz domains in R n . As a byproduct, we obtain the following : The first non vanishing eigenvalues λ 2 (Ω) of the standard Neumann (variational) boundary value problem on Ω for the Laplace operator are bounded below by a positive constant if the domains Ω vary and remain uniformly bounded and uniformly Lipschitz regular.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In similar way, we can show that the difference between the Eq. (53) and (12), converges to 0 as h, μ → 0+ This achieve the proof of assertion (ii).…”
Section: On (ϕ) (Iii) Ifsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In similar way, we can show that the difference between the Eq. (53) and (12), converges to 0 as h, μ → 0+ This achieve the proof of assertion (ii).…”
Section: On (ϕ) (Iii) Ifsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Note that T = u + V is solution of (SP ) for each u solution of (12). Thus, if ( , u( )) is solution of (14) then ( , T ( )) is solution of the problem (11).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Proof of Theorem The first estimate obviously follows from . To prove we integrate the density equation over normalΩFfalse(tfalse) and using the boundary conditions and we obtain 1false|normalΩF(t)false|normalΩFfalse(tfalse)ρfalse(t,xfalse)dx=ρ¯false(t0false).Since dist(normalΩSfalse(tfalse),Ω)>ν/2 and normalΩSfalse(tfalse) has smooth boundary for every t[0,), by Poincaré–Wirtinger inequality we obtain false∥ρ(t,x)ρ¯false∥Lqfalse(ΩF(t)false)CρLqfalse(ΩF(t)false),where the constant C can be chosen uniformly with respect to t (see for instance [, Theorem 1]). Thus we have truerighttrue∥eηfalse(·false)(ρρ¯)W1,p(0,;W1,qfalse(ΩF…”
Section: Global In Time Existencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compactness arguments show that the family of surfaces f " .t / I " 2 .0; " 0 I t 2 OE0; T g [ f .t / I t 2 OE0; T g satisfies the uniform cone property needed for Theorem 1 (Section 3) in [3]. Hence, by this Theorem, there holds the following uniform Poincaré-inequality:…”
Section: The Convergence Of the Solutionmentioning
confidence: 85%