2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-018-1966-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Two Different Formulas for the 3D Rectangular Prism Effect in Gravimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the same situation that we expect in the presence of subsurface cavities as shown in the example in (Blížkovský, 1979). In this concept of Bouguer anomaly calculation we handle this term as a correction, which is analogous to the terrain correctionso the K(P) term has a positive value and it is added in the process of Bouguer anomaly calculation use the classical formula from Sorokin (1951) and not the widely cited formula from Nagy (1966) the reasons are discussed in Karcol and Pašteka (2019). A more advanced approach is based on the approximation by means of 3D vertical prisms with different horizontal cross-sections (e.g.…”
Section: Typical Instruments Are: Lacoste and Romberg D Model Scintrexmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the same situation that we expect in the presence of subsurface cavities as shown in the example in (Blížkovský, 1979). In this concept of Bouguer anomaly calculation we handle this term as a correction, which is analogous to the terrain correctionso the K(P) term has a positive value and it is added in the process of Bouguer anomaly calculation use the classical formula from Sorokin (1951) and not the widely cited formula from Nagy (1966) the reasons are discussed in Karcol and Pašteka (2019). A more advanced approach is based on the approximation by means of 3D vertical prisms with different horizontal cross-sections (e.g.…”
Section: Typical Instruments Are: Lacoste and Romberg D Model Scintrexmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The exact dimensions of walls and other architectural features are obtained from plans and precise geodetic measurements, carried out inside and outside of the buildings. For the calculation of the vertical component of gravitational attraction for the 3D rectangular prism we use the classical formula from Sorokin (1951) and not the widely cited formula from Nagy (1966) – the reasons are discussed in Karcol and Pašteka (2019). A more advanced approach is based on the approximation by means of 3D vertical prisms with different horizontal cross‐sections (e.g.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%