1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01158692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the transient behavior of the processor sharing queue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that we twisted the load from ρ to 1 + /2 > 1 (and not 1) in the proof of Theorem 3.1 is useful for two reasons. First, it allows us to apply general theorems for transient PS queues, as derived in [15,24]. Secondly, we believe that directly twisting to a rate 1 leads to more restrictive assumptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that we twisted the load from ρ to 1 + /2 > 1 (and not 1) in the proof of Theorem 3.1 is useful for two reasons. First, it allows us to apply general theorems for transient PS queues, as derived in [15,24]. Secondly, we believe that directly twisting to a rate 1 leads to more restrictive assumptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, (Q p (u)) u∈ [0,x] and B 0 are independent. We now invoke a crucial result about the fluid limit of the number of customers Q(u) at time u for transient PS queues in overload, see Theorem 3.11 of Puha et al [24] -for a similar result, see Jean-Marie & Robert [15]. It entails that, if Q 0 = 0, there exists a constantα such that…”
Section: Theorem 31 If Assumptions 31 and 32 Are Valid Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar work on the M/G/l/PS transient queue was done later by Kitaev [9]. This was followed by a key paper in the area of transient analysis of the M/G/1/PS queue by Jean-Marie and Robert [8] who provide a fluid approximation for the case of fixed load ρ > 1. For this overloaded regime, they derive the asymptotic growth rate for the number of customers after t time units of overload (for large t), where this rate is the solution to a simple integral equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…[1]). An example of performance measures that depend on the whole distribution of service times but is insensitive to correlations is the growth rate of the number of customers or of the sojourn time in a (discriminatory) processor sharing queue in overload [2], [3]. Other insensitivity results on bandwidth sharing in a network can be found in [4], [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%