2014 IFIP Networking Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ifipnetworking.2014.6857115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the trade-off between cost and availability of virtual networks

Abstract: To minimize cost, Virtual Network Operators (VNOs) need to consider the required network availability already at the network design stage. One generic approach to reach the availability target is to select only high-quality physical network elements that offer high availability and consequently demand high expenses per element. The other generic approach to achieve high availability is to add protection capacity on the level of the virtual network based on lower cost components. In this paper, we analyze both … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assume that the availability of all links on the network initially is 0.99, with MTTR = 24 hrs, which corresponds to MTBF = 2400. If we were to increase the MTTR in one link (i.e., to reach a S or a l ), the improvement is subject to the cost function Cost = M T BF α from [15], where the MTBF value is for 1 km. For α, we use different values range from 1 to 2 with step size of 0.1, and also we use the geographic distances for links in both networks to calculate the MTBF.…”
Section: Monetary Cost and Implementation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assume that the availability of all links on the network initially is 0.99, with MTTR = 24 hrs, which corresponds to MTBF = 2400. If we were to increase the MTTR in one link (i.e., to reach a S or a l ), the improvement is subject to the cost function Cost = M T BF α from [15], where the MTBF value is for 1 km. For α, we use different values range from 1 to 2 with step size of 0.1, and also we use the geographic distances for links in both networks to calculate the MTBF.…”
Section: Monetary Cost and Implementation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grover and Sack [6] proposed to model the reduction of the mean-time-to-repair (MTTR) and the associated cost in terms of % of budget for improving availability as having an inverse relationship of the form Cost = (M T T R o /M T T R) 1/α where M T T R o is the baseline mean-time-to-repair and α is a parameter. Recently [15], models the cost of increasing the mean-time-between-failure (MTBF) as polynomial function of MTBF, namely Cost = M T BF α + K where α is a parameter and K is a constant fixed cost. Note, that these two works each focus on only one side of the techniques to improve availability.…”
Section: Monetary Cost and Implementation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we assume the availability of different fiber technologies as in Table I and Eq. (1) in [17] for 1 km. For a given fiber type t ∈ F t , we have the following availability:…”
Section: Greedy Iterative -Min Costmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the previous greedy iterative algorithm (Max Availability), extra backup fibers are added to improve the overall network availability assuming a single type of fiber, whereby reliability depends mainly on the fiber length. However, the availability of a given fiber can vary depending on its fiber technology, as investigated in [17]. Here we assume the availability of different fiber technologies as in Table I and Eq.…”
Section: Greedy Iterative -Min Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation