2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.648225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Trade Impact of Nominal Exchange Rate Volatility

Abstract: What is the effect of nominal exchange rate variability on trade? I argue that the methods conventionally used to answer this perennial question are plagued by a variety of sources of systematic bias. I propose a novel approach that simultaneously addresses all of these biases, and present new estimates from a broad sample of countries from 1970 to 1997. The answer to the question is "Zero:" Nominal exchange rate variabibily has no impact on trade flows.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
66
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(16 reference statements)
6
66
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Keesing and Singer (1991a) in the 1980s, the main constraint to exports is no longer the anti-trade bias of the import regime. 14 The lack of a significant effect of nominal exchange-rate volatility on exports is consistent with results reported by Tenreyro (2007). This author shows that estimates of the effect of volatility on exports are quite fragile in the context of the gravity model of trade.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Keesing and Singer (1991a) in the 1980s, the main constraint to exports is no longer the anti-trade bias of the import regime. 14 The lack of a significant effect of nominal exchange-rate volatility on exports is consistent with results reported by Tenreyro (2007). This author shows that estimates of the effect of volatility on exports are quite fragile in the context of the gravity model of trade.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The interaction between the homogeneous good classification and EPA budgets is negative in both cases, suggesting that an increase in EPA budgets has a smaller effect on exports of homogeneous than on heterogeneous goods, as expected. The rest of the variables have the expected signs, with the exception of the volatility of exchange rates (again, see Tenreyro (2007) for an explanation).…”
Section: Alternative Identification Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Results are presented in columns (3) and (4) of Table 4. The coefficient on exchange rate volatility is negative but not significant in both specifications, which is in line with the ambiguous effect put forward in the literature (Tenreyro 2007). Turning to our variables of interest, results remain consistent with the benchmark estimates.…”
Section: Time-varying Country Pair-specific Determinants Of Tradesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…To control for this potential omitted variable bias, I include a variable of exchange rate variability between countries i and j in year t, denoted vol ijt in (1). Following Tenreyro (2007), the exchange rate variability is measured as the standard deviation of the first difference of (the logarithm of) the monthly exchange rate between the two countries:…”
Section: Time-varying Country Pair-specific Determinants Of Tradementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, Rose's results are consistent with those of Dell'Ariccia. Tenreyro (2004), however, cast some doubt on the robustness of Rose's results. Using annual data from 1970-1997 on a sample of 104 (developed and developing) countries, and employing a gravity model that took endogeneity into account, she found that volatility had an insignificant effect on trade.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%