2007
DOI: 10.1205/cherd06087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Track to Understanding Three Phases in One Tower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the interaction between the two liquids, the liquid flow behavior changes dramatically which leads to the uncertainty of the separation efficiencies for the structured packed columns. The liquid flow behavior is an important factor affecting the separation efficiencies; the characteristics of the local flow behavior such as film flow, rivulet flow and droplet flow are required to be studied (Hoffmann et al, 2005;Repke et al, 2007). From the viewpoint of control and operation, the interfacial area for heat and mass transfer as well as the residence time should be increased in order to improve the separation efficiencies for the structured packed columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the interaction between the two liquids, the liquid flow behavior changes dramatically which leads to the uncertainty of the separation efficiencies for the structured packed columns. The liquid flow behavior is an important factor affecting the separation efficiencies; the characteristics of the local flow behavior such as film flow, rivulet flow and droplet flow are required to be studied (Hoffmann et al, 2005;Repke et al, 2007). From the viewpoint of control and operation, the interfacial area for heat and mass transfer as well as the residence time should be increased in order to improve the separation efficiencies for the structured packed columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are presented using non-dimensional Weber numbers defined as the ratio of fluid's inertia to surface tension (We = q L U L 2 e/r) and the contact angle h. Based on visual observation, this figure shows qualitatively that for conditions corresponding to a MEA flow with two different wetting conditions in terms of surface tension or contact angle, the interfacial area differs significantly. One obtains an interfacial area which is either very close to the geometrical area, as observed in experimental measurements for such a high liquid flow rate (Rocha et al, 1996;Repke et al, 2006), or significantly less than the geometric area when "default" VOF parameters are used. This disagreement calls for intensive work on this type of modeling.…”
Section: Simulations On a Small Scalementioning
confidence: 52%
“…The volume-of-fluid-like model in CFX 5.0 was utilized to study the same. The influence of surface tension was taken into account, and the simulation studies were validated with experimental work [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Cfd Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%