2014
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the tool use behavior of the bonobo‐chimpanzee last common ancestor, and the origins of hominine stone tool use

Abstract: The last common ancestor (LCA) shared by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (P. paniscus) was an Early Pleistocene African ape, which, based on the behavior of modern chimpanzees, may be assumed to be a tool-using animal. However, the character of tool use in the Pan lineage prior to the 20th century is largely unknown. Here, I use available data on wild bonobo tool use and emerging molecular estimates of demography during Pan evolution to hypothesise the plausible tool use behavior of the bonobo-chimpa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, even if currently sharing similar environments, different chimpanzee populations may have lived in different environments in the past. For example, a period of food scarcity in one area might have encouraged the chimpanzees living there to explore alternative available food sources, thus increasing the probability that more individuals in these populations would develop nut-cracking (see also Haslam, 2014 who further argues that “opportunity” and “relative profitability” drove the emergence of nut-cracking in some populations of chimpanzees). This situation would increase other group members’ exposure to nuts and nut-cracking materials and would therefore enhance both their motivation and opportunities to individually reinnovate the nut-cracking behaviour (via individual learning and non-copying mechanisms such as local and stimulus enhancement; see Zentall, 2003 for definitions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, even if currently sharing similar environments, different chimpanzee populations may have lived in different environments in the past. For example, a period of food scarcity in one area might have encouraged the chimpanzees living there to explore alternative available food sources, thus increasing the probability that more individuals in these populations would develop nut-cracking (see also Haslam, 2014 who further argues that “opportunity” and “relative profitability” drove the emergence of nut-cracking in some populations of chimpanzees). This situation would increase other group members’ exposure to nuts and nut-cracking materials and would therefore enhance both their motivation and opportunities to individually reinnovate the nut-cracking behaviour (via individual learning and non-copying mechanisms such as local and stimulus enhancement; see Zentall, 2003 for definitions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim, a emergência do uso de ferramentas não pode mais ser chamada de "hominização". Acredita-se hoje que o antepassado comum partilhado por bonobos e chimpanzés, que viveu no Pleistoceno há aproximadamente 2 milhões de anos [16], provavelmente usava ferramentas feitas de folhas com o intuito de sinalizar, fazer prospecções e cavar, segundo dados moleculares levantados a partir da demografia das duas espécies. Já o uso de ferramentas líticas surgiu independentemente nas duas espécies.…”
Section: Primatologia E Ciências Sociaisunclassified
“…No other primate experiences such difficulties. Some nonhuman primates use tools, but most of them cope with life's challenges without recourse to technology. Human obligatory tool use is a derived condition resulting from strong, sustained, and directional selective pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%