1991
DOI: 10.1016/0749-596x(91)90026-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

84
947
11
24

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 821 publications
(1,066 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
84
947
11
24
Order By: Relevance
“…This joint activation contributes to how lexical items are selected, leading to both facilitation and interference depending on the relation between the words (Costa, 2005). Moreover, within monolingual processing, there is other evidence that lexical retrieval becomes more difficult with aging, especially if there is competition from distracting cues (Burke, MacKay, Worthley, & Wade, 1991;Burke & Shafto, 2008;Van der Linden et al, 1999;Wingfield & Stine-Morrow, 2000), but at present there is no evidence that the magnitude of these changes is different for monolinguals and bilinguals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This joint activation contributes to how lexical items are selected, leading to both facilitation and interference depending on the relation between the words (Costa, 2005). Moreover, within monolingual processing, there is other evidence that lexical retrieval becomes more difficult with aging, especially if there is competition from distracting cues (Burke, MacKay, Worthley, & Wade, 1991;Burke & Shafto, 2008;Van der Linden et al, 1999;Wingfield & Stine-Morrow, 2000), but at present there is no evidence that the magnitude of these changes is different for monolinguals and bilinguals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In Experiment 2, we examined judgments of word frequency, a known indicator of fluency or accessibility (e.g., McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981). Although TOTs are thought to be more likely for low than high frequency words (e.g., Burke, MacKay, Worthley, & Wade, 1991), if participants assume that a TOT state indicates a heightened state of accessibility for an unretrieved word relative to when an unretrieved word elicits no TOT, participants may then infer from a TOT state a greater likelihood that the unretrieved word is of higher frequency relative to when a TOT does not occur.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for this omission is that TOT states rarely occur spontaneously, perhaps as infrequently as once a week (Cocks et al, 2013;Brown, 1991). However, TOT states increase with age (Burke, MacKay, Worthley, & Wade, 1991) and so one method for exploring the types of gestures used by healthy participants would be to explore gesture use during TOT states by older adults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite evidence that TOT states increase with age (Burke, MacKay, Worthley, & Wade, 1991), no studies have investigated the impact of aging on the gesture which often accompanies such states (co-TOT gestures). Co-TOT gestures are a type of iconic gesture, which are those gestures which depict semantic information typically about the shape or function of the object.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%