1983
DOI: 10.1029/jb088ib01p00593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the thermal effects of groundwater flow: 1. Regional scale systems

Abstract: Numerical solutions of the equations of fluid flow and heat transport are used to quantify the effects of groundwater flow on the subsurface thermal regime. Simulations are carried out for a vertical section through a basin with a distance of 40 km separating the regional topographic high and low. Emphasis is placed on understanding the conditions under which advective effects significantly perturb the thermal field. The transition from conduction-dominated to advection-dominated thermal regimes is sharp and d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
160
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
12
160
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In all scenarios, permeabilities less than 10 −14 m 2 yielded results that were essentially identical to those for conductive heat transfer over the time scale of a few years after an earthquake. These results differ from the case of topographically driven groundwater flow, which exhibits a smaller permeability threshold for advection (k > ∼10 −16 m 2 ) largely due to the fact that fluid flow is sustained for much longer periods of time, and most previous analyses assume a steady state condition [e.g., Smith and Chapman, 1983;Williams and Narisimhan, 1989;Saffer et al, 2003;Fulton et al, 2004]. We also find that advective disturbances to frictional heat anomalies at ∼1−2 km depth are generally small immediately after an earthquake, but their relative significance increases with time (Figure 3b).…”
Section: Modeling Results: Thermal Effects Of Transient Fluid Flowcontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…In all scenarios, permeabilities less than 10 −14 m 2 yielded results that were essentially identical to those for conductive heat transfer over the time scale of a few years after an earthquake. These results differ from the case of topographically driven groundwater flow, which exhibits a smaller permeability threshold for advection (k > ∼10 −16 m 2 ) largely due to the fact that fluid flow is sustained for much longer periods of time, and most previous analyses assume a steady state condition [e.g., Smith and Chapman, 1983;Williams and Narisimhan, 1989;Saffer et al, 2003;Fulton et al, 2004]. We also find that advective disturbances to frictional heat anomalies at ∼1−2 km depth are generally small immediately after an earthquake, but their relative significance increases with time (Figure 3b).…”
Section: Modeling Results: Thermal Effects Of Transient Fluid Flowcontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Under those conditions and the size of the hydraulic system, convection is generally possible (Manning and Ingebritsen 1999), thus theoretically enabling the possibility of advective coupled fluid and heat flow. Consequently, convection-driven heat advection may be more efficient then heat conduction (Clauser 2009;Deming et al 1992;Deming 1994;Manning and Ingebritsen 1999;Smith and Chapman 1983). This may challenge the purely conductive thermal model presented by Schintgen et al (2015).…”
Section: Hydrogeology Of the Lochkovian In The Ardennesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This correction is uncertain, as the near-surface temperature gradient can be affected by other causes, such as urbanization (e.g. Block et al, 2004;Ferguson and Woodbury, 2004) or groundwater flow (Smith and Chapman, 1983). Such effects should not affect our correction to first order.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Underground And Surface Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%