1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf00654604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the theory of the light curves of supernovae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
175
0
8

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
175
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This phase is better understood theoretically (e.g., Grassberg et al 1971;Chevalier 1976Chevalier , 1992Chevalier & Fransson 2008) and has been observed in a few cases (by GALEX, Gezari et al 2008;Schawinski et al 2008;and by Swift, Soderberg et al 2008; data shown as red and black circles in Figure 1). The shockcooling phase is longer and more luminous in larger stars.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This phase is better understood theoretically (e.g., Grassberg et al 1971;Chevalier 1976Chevalier , 1992Chevalier & Fransson 2008) and has been observed in a few cases (by GALEX, Gezari et al 2008;Schawinski et al 2008;and by Swift, Soderberg et al 2008; data shown as red and black circles in Figure 1). The shockcooling phase is longer and more luminous in larger stars.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Radiation hydrodynamic calculations of the explosion and evolution of Type II SNe have been presented by Grassberg et al (1971), Falk & Arnett (1977), Falk (1978), Klein & Chevalier (1978), Hillebrandt & Müller (1981), and Litvinova & Nadezhin (1983, 1985, as well as more specifically for SNe II-P by Young (2004), Utrobin (2007), Utrobin & Chugai (2009), Bersten et al (2011), and Dessart & Hillier (2011), for SNe II-L by Swartz et al (1991) and Blinnikov & Bartunov (1993) and for the peculiar Type II-P SN 1987A by Blinnikov et al (2000), Dessart & Hillier (2010) and Pumo & Zampieri (2011). Here we give a summary view of the physical processes at play and the various evolutionary stages seen in these simulations.…”
Section: Appendix A: Light Curve Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, features of the early light curves can be especially helpful in constraining progenitor properties. Emission dominated by shock cooling should reflect the radius and the density profile of the exploding star (see, e.g., Grassberg et al 1971;Falk & Arnett 1977;Soderberg et al 2008;Nakar & Sari 2010, hereafter NS10;Rabinak & Waxman 2011;Bersten et al 2013). The presence of extended material around the progenitor influences both the photometry and spectroscopy of the early SN light curve (see, e.g., Chevalier & Irwin 2011;Moriya et al 2011;Ginzburg & Balberg 2014;Nakar & Piro 2014;Svirski & Nakar 2014;Piro 2015 for the theoretical view and Ofek et al 2010;Garnavich et al 2016;Khazov et al 2016 for observational evidence).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%