1986
DOI: 10.1107/s0108767386098902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the theory of six-beam X-ray spherical-wave diffraction

Abstract: 441spectrometer with a single dispersing crystal with la, =O (i.e. a 'perfect' crystal) and a source of very small dimension in the plane of diffraction then a 'film' profile with s = 0 has twice the angular dispersion of the 'counter' profile (see Fig. 1 b). This suggests the possibility of increasing the numerical dispersion of the 'film' profile by using a non-standard 'inverse' scan mode with s=-l,-2, etc. to increase the effective dispersion relative to the 'counter' profile by 3, 4, etc. AbstractA gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. The method of the stationary phase (Kohn & Toneyan, 1986) allows one to determine the direction of the rays corresponding to the points of the angular dependence of the plane-wave diffraction. Using this method it is possible to show that this is just so, and this is due to the structure of the dispersion surface, which can be built from the function " 0 ð; 'Þ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. The method of the stationary phase (Kohn & Toneyan, 1986) allows one to determine the direction of the rays corresponding to the points of the angular dependence of the plane-wave diffraction. Using this method it is possible to show that this is just so, and this is due to the structure of the dispersion surface, which can be built from the function " 0 ð; 'Þ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the work by Kohn & Toneyan (1986) the theory of the multi-beam diffraction of X-ray spherical waves was presented. It was shown by means of approximate computer calculations that the intensity distribution on the photographic plate in the experimental scheme described above strongly depends on the distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if the distance L < 10 L f , where L f / t= 0 is the distance of diffraction focusing (Afanas'ev & Kon, 1977b,c), then a slight change of the experimental picture can arise compared to the angular theoretical dependence of intensity, as was shown in the work of Kohn & Toneyan (1986).…”
Section: The Methods Of Computer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This relation is valid in the geometrical optics approximation for very long distance L. In the real laboratory experiment the slit and the source have a finite size; therefore the picture is smoothed over the slit size and the angular source size. On the other hand, if the distance L < 10 L f , where L f / t= 0 is the distance of diffraction focusing (Afanas'ev & Kon, 1977b,c), then a slight change of the experimental picture can arise compared to the angular theoretical dependence of intensity, as was shown in the work of Kohn & Toneyan (1986).…”
Section: The Methods Of Computer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With increasing crystal thickness their visibility will increase. As was shown by Kohn & Toneyan (1986), the stationary phase method allows one to make a correspondence between the intensity of section topograph points and characteristics of plane-wave multiple diffraction such as the shape of the dispersion surface (DS), the amplitude of reflection and absorption coefficient. This correspondence is simpler when many branches of the DS (i.e.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%