2020
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2020.0163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Theory of Organizational Path Dependence: Clarifications, Replies to Objections, and Extensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Path dependency theorising (Greener, 2005; Mahoney, 2000; Sydow et al. , 2020) suggests that rather than being an outcome of rational decision-taking (Hodgson, 2012), once locked-in to a particular path (Goldstone, 1998), policy formation and application may simply be conditioned by habit (Greener, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Path dependency theorising (Greener, 2005; Mahoney, 2000; Sydow et al. , 2020) suggests that rather than being an outcome of rational decision-taking (Hodgson, 2012), once locked-in to a particular path (Goldstone, 1998), policy formation and application may simply be conditioned by habit (Greener, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that path dependency theory can help analysis on both of these issues, namely how to change organisational policy and practice in respect of resourcing and supporting minority expatriation mindful of the business and moral case for expatriate diversity. First, a path-dependent framework for assessing interventions to widen expatriate diversity can enable a “time-sensitive” understanding of organisational phenomena (Sydow et al. , 2020, p. 718), in place of “ahistorical generalities” (Hodgson, 2012, p. 94) informing strategic choices made by corporate managements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations