“…Since by b3) Dh Z (6) > Dh Z (7) ≥ 1, then the h-vector of Z is (1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 1). By [3] Lemma 5.3 we know that Z has the Cayley-Bacharach property CB (6). Since moreover the h-vector of Z is the same than the h-vector of a complete intersection of type (3,6), by [16] Z is complete intersection of a cubic and a sextic curve.…”