1984
DOI: 10.1029/gd012p0029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the tectonic evolution of Mexico: Paleomagnetic constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The excellent agreement of our mean Oaxaca remagnetization pole with late Paleozoic (Kiaman Interval) paleomagnetic results from cratonic North America [12] would seem to indicate that the Oaxaca sedimentary rocks were remagnetized during the late Paleozoic. However, paleomagnetic data from post-Paleozoic rocks from other parts of Mexico reveal a complicated and as yet poorly understood history of tectonic rotations (real or apparent) and latitudinal displacements of the various Mexican terranes with respect to cratonic North America [13]. It is paradoxical that the Oaxaca pole we have obtained is in such good agreement with late Paleo-zoic poles from the craton, when younger Mexican rocks that lie closer to cratonic North America yield highly anomalous results [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The excellent agreement of our mean Oaxaca remagnetization pole with late Paleozoic (Kiaman Interval) paleomagnetic results from cratonic North America [12] would seem to indicate that the Oaxaca sedimentary rocks were remagnetized during the late Paleozoic. However, paleomagnetic data from post-Paleozoic rocks from other parts of Mexico reveal a complicated and as yet poorly understood history of tectonic rotations (real or apparent) and latitudinal displacements of the various Mexican terranes with respect to cratonic North America [13]. It is paradoxical that the Oaxaca pole we have obtained is in such good agreement with late Paleo-zoic poles from the craton, when younger Mexican rocks that lie closer to cratonic North America yield highly anomalous results [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, paleomagnetic data from post-Paleozoic rocks from other parts of Mexico reveal a complicated and as yet poorly understood history of tectonic rotations (real or apparent) and latitudinal displacements of the various Mexican terranes with respect to cratonic North America [13]. It is paradoxical that the Oaxaca pole we have obtained is in such good agreement with late Paleo-zoic poles from the craton, when younger Mexican rocks that lie closer to cratonic North America yield highly anomalous results [13]. These considerations indicate that a late Paleozoic remagnetization cannot be tacitly assumed on the basis of the pole position: the agreement of the Oaxaca mean pole with late Paleozoic North American \.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strike-slip megashear models have been suggested by several authors (e.g. De Cserna, 1970Urrutia-Fucugauchi, 1981, 1984Anderson and Schmidt, 1983;Bohnel, 1985). The age, sense and amount of lateral displacement vary from model to model, but a secondary plate-boundary is invoked in which some California-type, large, vertical-axis block rotations could be expected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Paleomagnetic studies do not unequivocally support the existence of the Mojave-Sonora megashear (Urrutia-Fucugauchi, 1984;Kluger Cohen et al, 1986;Geissman, 1996, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%