“…Thus, in reviewing morphological, behavioural, and genetic studies, Segers (1995) concluded that the L and S strains could be defined as two distinct species, namely B. plicatilis sensu stricto (s.s.) and Brachionus rotundiformis Tschugunoff, 1921, respectively. Further investigations by , , Gómez & Snell (1996), Serra et al (1998), andOrtells et al (2000) using molecular markers and reproductive isolation tests revealed that several cryptic species could be ascribed to both B. plicatilis and B. rotundiformis. This revelation culminated in a paper by Ciros-Pérez et al (2001a) that used morphological, ecological, and genetic differences to support B. plicatilis s.s. and B. rotundiformis and to introduce a medium size type, designated SM, to the species complex with the description of Brachionus ibericus Ciros-Pérez, Gómez & Serra, 2001. At this stage, three groups were known: L with B. plicatilis s.s., SM with B. ibericus, and SS (here so called with two capital 's' to be clearly differentiated from the S strains) with B. rotundiformis (Fig.…”