Pale-green plate single crystals of new compound TmH [B 2 O 5 ] were obtained under hydrothermal conditions at T=270°-280°C and P=~70 atm. with the components weight ration Tm 2 O 3 :B 2 O 3 =1:1. Mineralizers Cl -and HCOOH were presented in the solution at concentration of~20 wt.%. This phase crystallizes also with Yb and Ho. The structure was determined without preliminary knowledge of chemical formula. Unit cell dimensions a=6. 82, b=8.61, c=11.43 Å, b=91.4, and experimental intensities were determined using Xcalibur S diffractometer equipped with CCD area detector. The data were integrated using Crys-Alis program. The structure was solved using Patterson method in CSD package in a space group C2/c = C [2] which has monoclinic symmetry with other unit cell. Both structures demonstrate equal pseudosymmetry described in common unit cell by orthorhombic supergroup Cmca. The deviation from orthorhombic to monoclinic systems in the structures is visualized by displacements of REE-atoms from special positions. "Layer" with the chains, disposed on ¼ of a-axis, has local orthorhombic pseudogroup Cmcb, subgroup of Cmca, and all its symmetry elements belongs to the "layer", thus the triangles are in mirror plane and tetradehda are divided by m-plane into two equal parts. Combination of the "layers" in pairs is realized by other symmetry elements which correspond to orthorhombic space group Pbna, other subgroup of Cmca. The multiplicities of both groups are equal and there are no variants in pairs determined by symmetry relation in accordance to OD-theory [3]. The origin of existence of two structural models is in the difference in ionic radii of the elements at the middle and at the end of the REE-elements row. Different displacements from pseudo-mirror plane provide better coordination environment in every case. Pseudosymmetry relations determine twinning, typical for Tm and Gd-diborates. (8) . This is in agreement with the observed {001} cleavage. The observed slabs and geometry of polyhedra match those observed in orthorhombic metasideronatrite by [1]. The main difference is the alternation of the slabs in the orthorhombic polytype upside up and upside down, where in the monoclinic polytype all the slabs point in the same direction. Thus the observed topology can be related to the theoretical natrosiderite-2M proposed by [2], by removal of two (H 2 O) groups. Incidentally, it is close related to the basic OD layer crystallographic parameters described by [2], i.e.: a = 7.265 and b = 7.120, and symmetry defined by the layer group P2 1 /m, while the width c 0 = 10.261 Å is reduced by the different staking sequence. Na-Na distance is 3.257(4) Å, slightly shorter than in the orthorhombic polytype. The finding of the monoclinic polytype of metasideronatrite supports the monoclinic model for sideronatrite and its formation by hydration of metasideronatrite-1M is under investigation.