2000
DOI: 10.1006/jdeq.1999.3655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Symbiotic Lotka–Volterra Model with Diffusion and Transport Effects

Abstract: In this work we analyze the existence, stability, and multiplicity of coexistence states for a symbiotic Lotka Volterra model with general diffusivities and transport effects. Global bifurcation theory, blowing up arguments for a priori bounds, singular perturbation results, singularity theory, and fixed point index in cones are among the techniques used to get our results and to explain the drastic change of behavior exhibited by the dynamics of the model between the cases of weak and strong mutualism between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest model for studying symbiotic relationships is described by Murray (2002) and consists of two interacting populations, similarly to the classic Lotka-Volterra predatorprey system. Symbiotic models based on the Lotka-Volterra formulation have attracted the interest of many mathematicians (Korman and Leung, 1987;Lou, 1996;Delgado et al, 2000;Pao, 2005) because they are suitable for studying existence, non-existence, uniqueness or multiplicity of solutions using various techniques (Delgado and Suárez, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest model for studying symbiotic relationships is described by Murray (2002) and consists of two interacting populations, similarly to the classic Lotka-Volterra predatorprey system. Symbiotic models based on the Lotka-Volterra formulation have attracted the interest of many mathematicians (Korman and Leung, 1987;Lou, 1996;Delgado et al, 2000;Pao, 2005) because they are suitable for studying existence, non-existence, uniqueness or multiplicity of solutions using various techniques (Delgado and Suárez, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, if g 1 is decreasing (respectively increasing) we can take g 1 = g 1 (0) (respectively g 1 = g 1 (v) = g 1 ( are decreasing, and so the region defined by (4.12) is non empty when g 1 and g 2 are decreasing, see also [12] for the semilinear case g 1 ≡ g 2 ≡ 0.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By a solution to (1.3) we mean a pair (u, v) ∈ C 2 (Ω) 2 such that u(x), v(x) → +∞ as d(x) → 0. This system has been treated for instance in [4], [16] and [19] in the case of homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. It is clear from the results in these works that the size of bc is determinant in the issues of existence of solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the relative position of λ and µ with respect to certain principal eigenvalues involving the semitrivial solutions is irrelevant when the boundary conditions are not homogeneous, unlike the case with homogeneous boundary conditions where it is known to play an essential rôle in existence, [4], [16], [19]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%