1977
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690230319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the surface diffusion of adsorbable gases through porous media

Abstract: A model is proposed for the hopping mechanism of surface diffusing molecules, adsorbed on porous solids, which allows a simple calculation of the mean hopping distance as a function of surface coverage.Surface permeabilities calculated with this model are compared to new experimental data. A satisfactory agreement is obtained, and the values of the parameters involved turn out to be very reasonable. MARTA SCOPEThe most commonly used models to describe the surface diffusion of physically adsorbed gases on poro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, the slope of the characteristic kinetic curve of the adsorbent at each point in Figure 8 coefficient with progressive surface coverage in the range studied is probably due to the advantageous effect of the increasing repulsion of adsorbed molecules, which is in agreement with the conclusions of other authors (Gilliland et al, 1958Ponzi et al, 1977;Sudo et a]., 1978). On the other hand, the sharp increase of the surface migration coefficient for values of the slope K* lower than 200 can be explained by taking into account that this range of slopes corresponds only to adsorbates of low adsorption capacity, such as methane in our case, which has a much higher surface diffusion coefficient than ethane and ethylene ( Table 4).…”
Section: Characteristic Kinetic Curvesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1, the slope of the characteristic kinetic curve of the adsorbent at each point in Figure 8 coefficient with progressive surface coverage in the range studied is probably due to the advantageous effect of the increasing repulsion of adsorbed molecules, which is in agreement with the conclusions of other authors (Gilliland et al, 1958Ponzi et al, 1977;Sudo et a]., 1978). On the other hand, the sharp increase of the surface migration coefficient for values of the slope K* lower than 200 can be explained by taking into account that this range of slopes corresponds only to adsorbates of low adsorption capacity, such as methane in our case, which has a much higher surface diffusion coefficient than ethane and ethylene ( Table 4).…”
Section: Characteristic Kinetic Curvesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, a molecule that jumps to the activated state can instead jump to the gas phase, thereby desorbing completely. We shall discuss briefly the way we can get the coverage dependence for a generalized concept of A. On the basis of a random walk with no return to the origin, X is found to be (Ponzi et al, 1977). (37) where Pef is the effective probability for a molecule to be captured when passing over an unoccupied site.…”
Section: Mean Free Path For Surface Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several models to describe the surface flux of adsorbed gases on solids have been developed and tested during the past three decades (Babbit, 1950;Gilliland et al, 1958Gilliland et al, , 1974Higashi et al, 1963;Horiguchi et al, 1971;Weaver et al, 1966;Smith et al, 1964;Roybal et al, 1972;Sladeck et al, 1974;Ponzi et al, 1977;Horas et al, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The models most commonly used to describe the surface flow mechanism are the hydrodynamic model (Babbit, 1950Gilliland et al, 1958) and the hopping model (Hill, 1956Higashi et al, 1963Smith and Metzner, 1964;Weaver and Metzner, 1966;Ponzi et al, 1977;Okazaki et al, 1981). The dependence of the surface flow coefficient on the amount adsorbed and the temperature for many experimental results can be correlated by these models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%