1994
DOI: 10.1515/form.1994.6.431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the support of the conjugation representation for solvable locally compact groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of the following lemma imitates an argument from [20,Lemma 2.5], where it has been used to determine the support inĜ of the conjugation representation of G on L 2 (G) for a compactly generated, compact-free, two-step nilpotent group.…”
Section: The Glimm Class Of a Primitive Idealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the following lemma imitates an argument from [20,Lemma 2.5], where it has been used to determine the support inĜ of the conjugation representation of G on L 2 (G) for a compactly generated, compact-free, two-step nilpotent group.…”
Section: The Glimm Class Of a Primitive Idealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty in dealing with such questions for y G is that in general very little is known about suppy G . Although there are various classes of groups satisfying suppy G = (G/Z(G)Y (see [32] and [35]), even for finite groups or 2-step nilpotent simply connected Lie groups suppy G can be strictly contained in (G/Z(G))" (compare [19] and [20]).…”
Section: Be a Closed Normal Subgroup Of G And Let $J Be A System Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a locally compact group G with left Haar measure and modular function S the conjugation representation y G of G on L 2 (G) is defined by feL 2 (G), x,yeG. y G has been investigated recently (see [19,20,21,24,32,35]). For semi-simple Lie groups, a related representation has been studied in [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, so far it is much less understood than the left regular representation. The main difficulty arising is that, even for finite groups, the support of yG is generally strictly contained in the dual of G/Z(G) and is intricate to determine (compare [11], [12], [13], [20], and [22]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%