2018
DOI: 10.5194/tc-2018-33
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the suitability of the Thorpe-Mason model for Calculating Sublimation of Saltating Snow

Abstract: Abstract. The Thorpe and Mason (TM) model for calculating the mass lost from a sublimating snow grain is the basis of all existing small and large-scale estimates of drifting snow sublimation and the associated snow mass balance of polar and alpine regions. We revisit this model to test its validity for calculating sublimation from saltating snow grains. It is shown that numerical solutions of the unsteady mass and heat balance equations of an individual snow grain reconcile well with the steady-state solution… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, model resolution has an impact on the simulated sublimations rates since crests where high sublimations rates are simulated have a smaller spatial extent at finer resolution . In addition, recent works by Huang and Shi (2017) and Sharma et al (2018) have suggested that blowing snow models should not neglect sublimation in the saltation layer which can lead to an underestimation of the importance of blowing snow sublimation by the models.…”
Section: Snow Sublimation: Mass Loss and Atmospheric Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, model resolution has an impact on the simulated sublimations rates since crests where high sublimations rates are simulated have a smaller spatial extent at finer resolution . In addition, recent works by Huang and Shi (2017) and Sharma et al (2018) have suggested that blowing snow models should not neglect sublimation in the saltation layer which can lead to an underestimation of the importance of blowing snow sublimation by the models.…”
Section: Snow Sublimation: Mass Loss and Atmospheric Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dery and Yau, 1999]. Recent model simulations by Sharma et al [2018] and Dai and Huang [2014] have shed light on the importance of temperature and wind speed fluctuations at the timescales of the sweep and ejection processes highlighted here. The comparison of the Sharma et al [2018] large-eddy-simulation-driven sublimation model with the widely used steady-state model of Thorpe and Mason [1966] revealed that transient sublimation rates approached the steady-state model only after time periods ranging from 10 -2 to 10 s, depending on particle diameter and ventilation rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The mean temperatures varied from -7 C during the previous three days to +3 C during the night of Jan 21. This resulted in a much larger difference between air and snow surface temperatures, and provided an interesting comparison of conditions that are critical for snow sublimation at short timescales [Sharma et al, 2018].…”
Section: Fieldworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, large eddy simulation (LES) models could be used to simulate accumulation areas under variable wind conditions, and high resolution snowpack models (e.g., Lehning et al, 2002;Wever et al, 2015) could be applied to assess quantity and timing of water draining though a wet pile of machine-made snow. Finally, numerical models of drifting snow that account for thermodynamic effects of sublimating snow particles while traveling through the air (e.g., Thorpe and Mason, 1966;Dery et al, 1998;Wever et al, 2009;Groot Zwaaftink et al, 2013;Sharma et al, 2018) could be adapted to model physical processes during snowmaking. Such physical processes involved, their implications, dimensions, and interdependencies could be systematically analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%