2014
DOI: 10.1097/jpo.0000000000000041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Suitability of Integrating Accelerometry Data with Electromyography Signals for Resolving the Effect of Changes in Limb Position during Dynamic Limb Movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, accelerometers have been the main supplementary modality and are the most prevalent in shared surface EMG datasets, such as Khushaba et al 5, Ninapro 2, 3, 5, 7, and mmGest datasets (see Tables 1-3). Accelerometery has been shown to provide additional information to EMG, especially to reduce the effects of limb position [47,48].…”
Section: Multiple Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, accelerometers have been the main supplementary modality and are the most prevalent in shared surface EMG datasets, such as Khushaba et al 5, Ninapro 2, 3, 5, 7, and mmGest datasets (see Tables 1-3). Accelerometery has been shown to provide additional information to EMG, especially to reduce the effects of limb position [47,48].…”
Section: Multiple Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,20 These efforts rely primarily on the incorporation of data from accelerometers to augment EMG signal to identify training positions that correspond to the current limb position, and utilize grasp classifiers constructed based on position-specific training data. 4,5,8 However, this methodology has resulted in a decline in performance when using accelerometer and EMG signals compared to when using EMG alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,8 However, this methodology has resulted in a decline in performance when using accelerometer and EMG signals compared to when using EMG alone. 20 Position-matching strategies alone do not seem adequate to improve robustness. Therefore, this study was designed to examine specific covariates, including features such as hand height, elbow angle and shoulder angle, as well as a novel 3D training paradigm to generate a more robust classifier to function in multiple positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Applications in prosthetic control were not explicitly explored. Practical discussions and considerations for fusing accelerometer and EMG data were presented by Radmand et al 30 The clinically impractical needs of training classifiers in a number of possible arm positions is discussed, referred to as ''Dynamic training'', and the otherwise very lengthy time requirement for training was able to be minimized somewhat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Others have proposed force sensors placed in contact the skin used to detect the changes in force and pressure within the socket due to volumetric changes of the forearm. This technique also known as force myography (FMG), 28 residual kinetic imaging (RKI), 29 and muscle pressure mapping (MPM) 30 shows promise in providing an alternate and additional input for signal classification. Craelius et al referred to this method as residual kinetic imaging in 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%