2014
DOI: 10.1017/s1474748014000206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Substitution Theorem for Rings of Semialgebraic Functions

Abstract: Abstract. Let R ⊂ F be an extension of real closed fields and S(M, R) the ring of (continuous) semialgebraic functions on a semialgebraic set M ⊂ R n . We prove that every R-homomorphism ϕ : S(M, R) → F is essentially the evaluation homomorphism at a certain point p ∈ F n adjacent to the extended semialgebraic set MF . This type of result is commonly known in Real Algebra as Substitution Theorem. In case M is locally closed, the results are neat while the non locally closed case requires a more subtle approach… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of a (continuous) semialgebraic extension is never an obstacle: any locally compact semialgebraic set M ⊂ R m is the semialgebraic retract of a small open semialgebraic neighborhood V ⊂ R m of M , see [DK1,Thm.1]. For non-locally compact semialgebraic sets even the existence of a semialgebraic extension map is a delicate point [Fe2]. As we see below, if f : M → R is a semialgebraic function, there exists a semialgebraic embedding j : M ֒→ R p and a semialgebraic function…”
Section: Rings Of S R -Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of a (continuous) semialgebraic extension is never an obstacle: any locally compact semialgebraic set M ⊂ R m is the semialgebraic retract of a small open semialgebraic neighborhood V ⊂ R m of M , see [DK1,Thm.1]. For non-locally compact semialgebraic sets even the existence of a semialgebraic extension map is a delicate point [Fe2]. As we see below, if f : M → R is a semialgebraic function, there exists a semialgebraic embedding j : M ֒→ R p and a semialgebraic function…”
Section: Rings Of S R -Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between S 0 (M ) and S(M ). In [Fe2,Cor.6] it is proved that if M is a 2-dimensional semialgebraic set such that the germ M x is connected for each x ∈ Cl(M ), then S(M ) = S 0 (M ). The following result is the 2-dimensional version of Theorem 1.1 and generalizes [Fe2,Cor.6…”
Section: Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, m α := p α is the maximal ideal of S(M ) satisfying m α ∩ S * (M ) ⊂ m * α . The last part of the statement follows from [Fe2,(1.B.2)].…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors consider there the case of the oriented blow-up of a real analytic manifold M with center a closed real analytic submanifold N whose vanishing ideal inside M is finitely generated (this happens for instance if N is compact). In [Fe2,§3] we present a similar construction in the semialgebraic setting, which is used to 'appropriately embed' semialgebraic sets in Euclidean spaces. The following result, whose proof makes use of the drilling blow-up and which will be a key tool for our purposes, will allow to erase a closed Nash submanifold from a Nash manifold (see Figure 5).…”
Section: A Main Ingredient: the Drilling Blow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%