2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13366-013-0185-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the structure group of a decomposable model space

Abstract: We study the structure group of a canonical algebraic curvature tensor built from a symmetric bilinear form, and show that in most cases it coincides with the isometry group of the symmetric form from which it is built. Our main result is that the structure group of the direct sum of such canonical algebraic curvature tensors on a decomposable model space must permute the subspaces V i on which they are defined. For such an algebraic curvature tensor, we show that if the vector space V is a direct sum of subsp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The defining properties of algebraic curvature tensors can be used to show (see [4]) that the definition of the kernel of an algebraic curvature tensor is not biased towards the first entry, that is, ker(R) = {y ∈ V | R(x, y, z, w) = 0 for all x, z, w ∈ V } = {z ∈ V | R(x, y, z, w) = 0 for all x, y, w ∈ V } = {w ∈ V | R(x, y, z, w) = 0 for all x, y, z ∈ V }.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The defining properties of algebraic curvature tensors can be used to show (see [4]) that the definition of the kernel of an algebraic curvature tensor is not biased towards the first entry, that is, ker(R) = {y ∈ V | R(x, y, z, w) = 0 for all x, z, w ∈ V } = {z ∈ V | R(x, y, z, w) = 0 for all x, y, w ∈ V } = {w ∈ V | R(x, y, z, w) = 0 for all x, y, z ∈ V }.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can use Properties 2 and 3 of algebraic curvature tensors to show that for any x ∈ Ker(R) and y, z, w ∈ V , R(x, y, z, w) = R(y, x, z, w) = R(y, z, x, w) = R(y, z, w, x) = 0 [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ik − 3b 2 ik Hence a ik = ±b ik for all i ≤ n and k > n. Now let's consider R(e i , f k , f l , e i ):R(e i , f k , f l , e i ) = 3a il a ik − 3b il b ik = 0Since a il = ±b il and a ik = ±b ik , a il a ik = b il b ik if and only if a ih = δb ih for all i ≤ n and h > n where δ is either 1 or −1. This proves 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%