1993
DOI: 10.1029/93pa02751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the structure and origin of major glaciation cycles 2. The 100,000‐year cycle

Abstract: Climate over the past million years has been dominated by glaciation cycles with periods near 23,000, 41,000, and 100,000 years. In a linear version of the Milankovitch theory, the two shorter cycles can be explained as responses to insolation cycles driven by precession and obliquity. But the 100,000-year radiation cycle (arising from eccentricity variation) is much too small in amplitude and too late in phase to produce the corresponding climate cycle by direct forcing. We present phase observations showing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

22
571
2
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 907 publications
(611 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
22
571
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…According to modelling experiments, insolation impulse during Termination V was somewhat weak to drive glacial climate quickly towards full-interglacial conditions (Imbrie et al, 1993;Li et al, 1998). Additionally, European ice-sheet expansion was very large during MIS 12 (Donner, 1995), a fact which might help to explain not only the exceptional length of Termination V (Oppo et al, 1998;Bauch et al, 2000;Billups et al, 2004;Healey and Thunell, 2004;de Abreu et al, 2005) but also the difference in SST dynamics between polar and middle/low latitudes as revealed by us for the early interglacial phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to modelling experiments, insolation impulse during Termination V was somewhat weak to drive glacial climate quickly towards full-interglacial conditions (Imbrie et al, 1993;Li et al, 1998). Additionally, European ice-sheet expansion was very large during MIS 12 (Donner, 1995), a fact which might help to explain not only the exceptional length of Termination V (Oppo et al, 1998;Bauch et al, 2000;Billups et al, 2004;Healey and Thunell, 2004;de Abreu et al, 2005) but also the difference in SST dynamics between polar and middle/low latitudes as revealed by us for the early interglacial phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this age model, the 4-m-thick reversed polarity interval of diamictite and sandstone at the base of sequence 9 is inferred to represent a short-duration geomagnetic excursion within C6Cn.3n, and the LO of D. bisectus in CRP-2/2A is correlated with C6Cn.2r in the earliest Miocene. This alternative age model has been considered unlikely 28 because: (1) the polarity signal is robust for the interval of CRP core, (2) the MPTS 31 (3) the age of the LO of D. bisectus would be inconsistent with Southern Ocean records 30 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key for ice margin proximity is shown in Fig. 2 31 . In summary, the pattern of ice-volume change that is indicated by the deep ocean record (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, temporal development of ice-age cycles provides critical information about the nature of long-term climate cooling over the past few million years, in response to CO 2 reduction and interactions among ice, land cover, and climate (e.g., Clark et al, 2006;K€ ohler and Bintanja, 2008;de Boer et al, 2010de Boer et al, , 2012Hansen et al, 2013). Third, variable amplitude of individual ice ages helps to determine the relationship between climate change, astronomical climate forcing cycles, and climate feedbacks on timescales of 10se100s of kiloyears (e.g., Oglesby, 1990;Imbrie et al, 1993;Raymo et al, 2006;Colleoni et al, 2011Colleoni et al, , 2016Ganopolski and Calov, 2011;Carlson and Winsor, 2012;Abe-Ouchi et al, 2013;Hatfield et al, 2016;Liakka et al, 2016). Fourth, the size and spatial distribution of land ice during past glacials determines crustal rebound processes when ice masses melt, which in turn affects sea-level reconstructions for subsequent interglacials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%