2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3631013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the stochastic nature of resistive switching in Cu doped Ge0.3Se0.7 based memory devices

Abstract: Currently, there is great interest in using solid electrolytes to develop resistive switching based nonvolatile memories (RRAM) and logic devices. Despite recent progress, our understanding of the microscopic origin of the switching process and its stochastic behavior is still limited. In order to understand this behavior, we present a statistical "breakdown" analysis performed on Cu doped Ge 0.3 Se 0.7 based memory devices under elevated temperature and constant voltage stress conditions. Following the approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stepwise variations in Figure 5 c on top of the overall current decay could be explained by the stochastic change in the conduction path due to persistent trapping and detrapping of electrons leading to the rearrangement of the network composed of occupied traps. [ 47,48 ] Such behaviors have been successfully modeled for percolation networks with competing defect generation and defect recovery mechanisms, [ 48,49 ] again supporting electron trapping as the mechanism of the observed switching effect in oxidized graphene electrodes. The difference in retention time between the functionalized graphene electrodes in the MLG/Ta 2 O 5-x /TaO y /MLG devices and the annealed graphene samples may be explained by the different interfaces in the two types of devices, as the TaO y layer passivating the graphene fi lm could change the energy profi le of the electron traps and make it easier for the trapped electrons to escape in the MLG/Ta 2 O 5-x /TaO y /MLG devices.…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The stepwise variations in Figure 5 c on top of the overall current decay could be explained by the stochastic change in the conduction path due to persistent trapping and detrapping of electrons leading to the rearrangement of the network composed of occupied traps. [ 47,48 ] Such behaviors have been successfully modeled for percolation networks with competing defect generation and defect recovery mechanisms, [ 48,49 ] again supporting electron trapping as the mechanism of the observed switching effect in oxidized graphene electrodes. The difference in retention time between the functionalized graphene electrodes in the MLG/Ta 2 O 5-x /TaO y /MLG devices and the annealed graphene samples may be explained by the different interfaces in the two types of devices, as the TaO y layer passivating the graphene fi lm could change the energy profi le of the electron traps and make it easier for the trapped electrons to escape in the MLG/Ta 2 O 5-x /TaO y /MLG devices.…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is thus difficult to formulate an expression for the switching time for a voltage sweep. Therefore, we restrict our study to voltage pulses and the nucleation time t nuc is then given by 26,49 …”
Section: Theory and A Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as pointed out earlier, this necessary condition is not sufficient to distinguish the ferroelectric-driven TER (FE-TER) from resistance-switching phenomena resulting from-so to speak-'redox' reactions 35 . Indeed, given that the very high coercive fields of ultrathin ferroelectric films fall into the electric-field range where the occurrence of a soft breakdown of the film cannot be excluded, there remain concerns that stochastic redox-based resistance switching might be misinterpreted as the FE-TER [36][37][38][39][40][41] . Therefore, it is of crucial importance to investigate both the TER effect and the redox-based resistive switching in a single FTJ to undoubtedly distinguish between the two different phenomena.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%