2020
DOI: 10.1109/tccn.2019.2940570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Stochastic Modeling of the Holding Time of SUs to PU Channels in Cognitive Radio Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the PTx is active, the secondary user needs to vacate the operating spectrum for the primary transmission. The activity model of the primary users can be used to assist for such operation [49]. Such model can be used to describe the coexistence between LTE and WiFi spectrum sharing system [50].…”
Section: Comparison Of Sr With Crmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the PTx is active, the secondary user needs to vacate the operating spectrum for the primary transmission. The activity model of the primary users can be used to assist for such operation [49]. Such model can be used to describe the coexistence between LTE and WiFi spectrum sharing system [50].…”
Section: Comparison Of Sr With Crmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channel assignment design is a challenging problem in Cognitive Radio Networks. Various Channel assignment methods have been previously proposed for CRNs [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Most of them were designed for wireless networks without backhaul networks.…”
Section: Motivation and Research Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], authors have investigated the problem concerned with the amount of time with which a secondary user can hold a primary channel or more in cognitive radio networks as well as the average amount of data that can be transmitted during this time. They have derived closed-form probabilistic expressions for the distribution of time, which includes identical and nonidentical primary channels, in terms of the activity levels of primary users and for a different number of secondary users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDLE and BUSY, which correspond to the two cases where the PD is or isn't utilizing the channel, respectively. We assume that the state transition of the channel follows a two-state continuous-time Markov Chain (CTMC), which is a reasonable and widely-adopted assumption [7], [8]. Let 𝑢 and 𝑣 be the transition rates from IDLE to BUSY and from BUSY to IDLE, which jointly represent the traffic pattern of the PD.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%