2012
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/ass023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the stick-breaking representation of normalized inverse Gaussian priors

Abstract: Random probability measures are the main tool for Bayesian nonparametric inference, with their laws acting as prior distributions. Many well-known priors used in practice admit different, though (in distribution) equivalent, representations. Some of these are convenient if one wishes to thoroughly analyze the theoretical properties of the priors being used, others are more useful for modeling dependence and for addressing computational issues. As for the latter purpose, so-called stick-breaking constructions c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This extraordinarily clarifying perspective has inspired a number of nonparametric models (MacEachern, 1999, 2000; Hjort, 2000; Ishwaran and Zarepour, 2000; Ishwaran and James, 2001; Griffin and Steel, 2006; Dunson and Park, 2008; Chung and Dunson, 2009; Rodriguez and Dunson, 2011; Broderick et al, 2012), has provided insight into the properties of related models (Favaro et al, 2012; Teh et al, 2007; Thibaux and Jordan, 2007; Paisley et al, 2010), and has been used to develop efficient inference algorithms (Ishwaran and James, 2001; Blei and Jordan, 2006; Papaspiliopoulos and Roberts, 2008; Walker, 2007; Kalli et al, 2011). …”
Section: Equivalent Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extraordinarily clarifying perspective has inspired a number of nonparametric models (MacEachern, 1999, 2000; Hjort, 2000; Ishwaran and Zarepour, 2000; Ishwaran and James, 2001; Griffin and Steel, 2006; Dunson and Park, 2008; Chung and Dunson, 2009; Rodriguez and Dunson, 2011; Broderick et al, 2012), has provided insight into the properties of related models (Favaro et al, 2012; Teh et al, 2007; Thibaux and Jordan, 2007; Paisley et al, 2010), and has been used to develop efficient inference algorithms (Ishwaran and James, 2001; Blei and Jordan, 2006; Papaspiliopoulos and Roberts, 2008; Walker, 2007; Kalli et al, 2011). …”
Section: Equivalent Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important NRM is given by the normalized inverseGaussian N IG(c, G 0 ) process (Lijoi et al, 2005), which can be characterized as a stick-breaking process (Favaro et al, 2012), defined by the stick-breaking construction (12a-12d), after relaxing the i.i.d. assumption (12a), by allowing for dependence among the υ j distributions, with:…”
Section: Key Bnp Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…given by equation (4) in Favaro et al (2012), and Eqs. 15b-15c refer to GIG and inverse-gamma (IG) distributions.…”
Section: Key Bnp Regression Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, (X j ) j ≥1 is a sequence of random variables, independent of (V j ) j ≥1 , and independent and identically distributed according to P 0 . See Favaro, Lijoi, and Prünster (2012) for a detailed analysis of the stick-breaking representation in Equation (13) with σ = 1/2.…”
Section: Sampling σ -Stable Poisson-kingman Mixture Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%