IET Conference Publications 2009
DOI: 10.1049/cp.2009.1193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the statistical modeling of MIMO land mobile satellite channels: a consolidated approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the LMS, the scatterering rich environment local to the mobile terminal provides low correlation between the antenna branches, while at the satellite there are directional antennas with highly orthogonal circular polarizations, thus their correlation is also low. At each end therefore, the correlation is controlled independently and also remains low in a non line of sight scenario, which therefore justifies that the channel is separable in order to allow the well known Kronecker model to be applied [15] 9) In the case where there is low shadowing and a line of sight (LOS), the channel cannot be considered separable and thus the Kronecker assumption does not hold. Thus the Kronecker model has been extended here such that it is suited to a 2x2 satellite MIMO system in a LOS environment with dual circular polarization, which enables polarization multiplexing.…”
Section: Model Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of the LMS, the scatterering rich environment local to the mobile terminal provides low correlation between the antenna branches, while at the satellite there are directional antennas with highly orthogonal circular polarizations, thus their correlation is also low. At each end therefore, the correlation is controlled independently and also remains low in a non line of sight scenario, which therefore justifies that the channel is separable in order to allow the well known Kronecker model to be applied [15] 9) In the case where there is low shadowing and a line of sight (LOS), the channel cannot be considered separable and thus the Kronecker assumption does not hold. Thus the Kronecker model has been extended here such that it is suited to a 2x2 satellite MIMO system in a LOS environment with dual circular polarization, which enables polarization multiplexing.…”
Section: Model Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this model extends the capabilities to the MIMO case, where its stochastic properties are derived from an S-band tree-lined road measurement campaign using dual circular polarizations at low elevations. Furthermore, this model in particular compared to existing models to date [8] [9] considers the interdependence between the small scale fading. The authors have found the most appropriate means to accommodate this interdependence is to use a Ricean fading model, where the co-polar and cross-polar components are suitably correlated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 13 presents the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the LMS channel capacities for the dual polarized MIMO and SISO cases calculated using (9) and (10), respectively. The channel time series are generated using the simulator shown in Fig.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation a Channel Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Availability of realistic channel time series and detailed knowledge of their correlation properties are needed for performing accurate simulations [5]. Several studies on terrestrial MIMO systems can be found in the literature, while studies on LMS MIMO are rather limited, among them are [1], [6]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a starting point, Section 2 summarizes the state-of-the-art concerning dual polarization MIMO in terrestrial wireless and demonstrates the advantages of MIMO for typical channel cases. Section 3 briefly reviews the most comprehensive MIMO LMS channel model available in the literature [12]. The concepts described in these sections are then applied in Section 4 for a detailed MIMO versus SISO comparison in LMS broadcasting systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%