2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aam.2005.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Stanley–Wilf limit of 4231-avoiding permutations and a conjecture of Arratia

Abstract: We construct a sequence of finite automata that accept subclasses of the class of 4231-avoiding permutations. We thereby show that the Wilf-Stanley limit for the class of 4231-avoiding permutations is bounded below by 9.35. This bound shows that this class has the largest such limit among all classes of permutations avoiding a single permutation of length 4 and refutes the conjecture that the Wilf-Stanley limit of a class of permutations avoiding a single permutation of length k cannot exceed (k − 1) 2 .

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not known whether [3], but it is not known which permutations do achieve the maximum or minimum. An interesting aspect of pattern avoidance was considered by Albert [1].…”
Section: Pattern Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is not known whether [3], but it is not known which permutations do achieve the maximum or minimum. An interesting aspect of pattern avoidance was considered by Albert [1].…”
Section: Pattern Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the left-hand side of equation (8) follows. The right-hand side is then a consequence of the hook-length formula (3). 2…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 2 and 4 contain illustrations of large 1324-avoiders. 1 As is noted by Flajolet & Sedgewick ([8] p.169), the fact that a single example can be used to illustrate the asymptotic structure of a large random combinatorial object can be attributed to concentration of distributions, of which we make much use below in determining our lower bound. Observe the cigar-shaped boundary regions consisting of numerous small subtrees, and also the relative scarcity of points in the interior, which tend to be partitioned into a few paths connecting the two boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as lower bounds go, Albert, Elder, Rechnitzer, Westcott & Zabrocki [1] have established that the growth rate is at least 9.47, by using the insertion encoding of 1324-avoiders to construct a sequence of finite automata that accept subclasses of Av(1324). The growth rate of a subclass is then determined from the transition matrix of the corresponding automaton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ordered version of Turán theory, the question is: what is the maximum number edges of an ordered bipartite graph with parts of size p and q with no subgraph isomorphic to a given ordered bipartite graph? More results on this problem and its variations are given in [1,3,4,8,9]. As another variation, interval minors were recently introduced by Fox in [5] in the study of Stanley-Wilf limits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%