1983
DOI: 10.1016/0036-9748(83)90340-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the stability of surface martensite in β-phase CuZn alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) that cannot be indexed with the cubic L2 1 structure. In fact, these two peaks were resulted from the "surface martensite" with limited amount, as commonly observed in FeNi and Cu-Zn alloys [45,46] and confirmed by the SEM/ EBSD measurements on bulk Ni-Mn-In alloys with the same composition.…”
Section: Martensitic Transformationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…2) that cannot be indexed with the cubic L2 1 structure. In fact, these two peaks were resulted from the "surface martensite" with limited amount, as commonly observed in FeNi and Cu-Zn alloys [45,46] and confirmed by the SEM/ EBSD measurements on bulk Ni-Mn-In alloys with the same composition.…”
Section: Martensitic Transformationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Both these phenomena could lead to nickel rich Ni-AI layers near the surface raising the Ms and a possibility of transformation to martensite much as in Cu-Zn-Al alloys [25]. Surface martensites in these latter alloys are known to be associated with varying fault density, depending on loll orientation, which have been recognised by the accompanying changes in the diffraction patterns [26,27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[58][59][60] However, this effect will only cause minor changes in M s temperature, and cannot account for a difference of hundreds of degrees Celsius. [61] In fact, despite different strain fields, the M s temperature of spontaneous transformation to martensite and the M s temperature of stress-induced transformation in a single crystal or polycrystal do not show substantial differences. [62] Therefore, Wayman [63] proposed that we distinguish between "martensite formed at a surface" and "surface martensite".…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%