2018
DOI: 10.4171/jst/214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the stability of some isoperimetric inequalities for the fundamental tones of free plates

Abstract: We provide a quantitative version of the isoperimetric inequality for the fundamental tone of a biharmonic Neumann problem. Such an inequality has been recently established by Chasman adapting Weinberger's argument for the corresponding second order problem. Following a scheme introduced by Brasco and Pratelli for the second order case, we prove that a similar quantitative inequality holds also for the biharmonic operator. We also prove the sharpness of both such an inequality and the corresponding one for the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Problem (NBS) has been discussed in [25,28,29] for σ = 1. We point out that problem (BS λ ) with σ = λ = 0 has been introduced in [12] as the natural fourth order generalization of the classical Steklov problem for the Laplacian (see also [11]). As we shall see, problem (BS λ ) shares much more analogies with the classical Steklov problem than those already presented in [12], in particular it plays a role in describing the space γ 0 (H 2 ( )) similar to that played by the Steklov problem for the Laplacian in describing γ 0 (H 1 ( )) (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem (NBS) has been discussed in [25,28,29] for σ = 1. We point out that problem (BS λ ) with σ = λ = 0 has been introduced in [12] as the natural fourth order generalization of the classical Steklov problem for the Laplacian (see also [11]). As we shall see, problem (BS λ ) shares much more analogies with the classical Steklov problem than those already presented in [12], in particular it plays a role in describing the space γ 0 (H 2 ( )) similar to that played by the Steklov problem for the Laplacian in describing γ 0 (H 1 ( )) (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 3 we examine the problem of shape differentiability of the eigenvalues. We consider problem (10) in φ(Ω) and pull it back to Ω, where φ belongs to a suitable class of diffeomorphisms. We also derive Hadamard-type formulas for the elementary symmetric functions of the eigenvalues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28,Example 2.15] where problem (1.3) with τ = 0 is referred to as the Neumann problem for the biharmonic operator. Moreover, we point out that a number of recent papers devoted to the analysis of (1.2) have con rmed that problem (1.2) can be considered as the natural Neumann problem for the biharmonic operator, see [7], [8], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [29]. We also refer to [22] for an extensive discussion on boundary value problems for higher order elliptic operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%