2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-012-1270-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the stability of single-walled carbon nanotubes and their binding strengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Fig. S2, the armchair interface energy is lower than the zigzag interface energy, in agreement with previous studies [25][26][27]. Thus, for short armchair and zigzag tubes with the same termination the armchair tube has a lower energy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As seen in Fig. S2, the armchair interface energy is lower than the zigzag interface energy, in agreement with previous studies [25][26][27]. Thus, for short armchair and zigzag tubes with the same termination the armchair tube has a lower energy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As reported in earlier studies, hydrogen-terminated tube segments with a zigzag character have antiferromagnetic ground states 75 76 77 . We report energy windows (∆E) of the difference between the most stable and least stable SWNT within the series (see Table 1 ) in agreement with previously reported values for the 9 to 11 series 58 , and the 12 and 13 series 59 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It has been shown that it is possible to affect the chirality of the growing SWNT by varying the experimental conditions, such as catalyst composition 12 14 15 16 52 53 54 55 temperature 56 , carbon precursor 10 17 , carrier gas pressure 57 , and catalyst support 11 18 . Concurrently, several reports have investigated the energetic stability of different chiralities 58 59 and their caps 60 61 62 63 , and some studies have also compared theoretical and experimental data in an effort to clarify the production of SWNTs of certain chiralities 64 65 . However, despite numerous studies on the production of SWNTs, a detailed understanding of the correlation between experiment and theory is lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are considerable differences in the bond strength of armchair and zigzag SWNT and graphene edges, 17,18,[43][44][45][46] which originate from fragment stabilization in the form of triple bond formation on armchair edges. 47,48 This has been shown to be a collective effect that occurs when several neighboring bonds are broken, however, the individual M-C bonds are of equal strength even for the two extreme armchair and zigzag ends. 47,48 We have thus opted to calculate the M-C bond strengths for the zigzag tubes (10,0) and (5,0) that do not undergo triple-bond fragment stabilization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 This has been shown to be a collective effect that occurs when several neighboring bonds are broken, however, the individual M-C bonds are of equal strength even for the two extreme armchair and zigzag ends. 47,48 We have thus opted to calculate the M-C bond strengths for the zigzag tubes (10,0) and (5,0) that do not undergo triple-bond fragment stabilization. In Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%