2012
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201248173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the stability of elastic nanoparticles

Abstract: Recent studies aimed at modification and destruction of metal nanoparticles via laser pulse and DC electric field treatment require careful analyses of charge and field instability of metal nanoparticles. Though the stability bounds of liquid drops are known well, the stability conditions of rigid nanoparticle surrounded by elastic media are still not clear. In this work we have revealed the boundaries of charge and electric field stability for rigid nanoparticles. Charge‐field stability bounds of silver na… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experimental conditions, one may expect the elongation of the nanoparticles caused by electrical forces at fluences above 0.625 J/cm 2 results in their partition with the formation of less elongated nanoparticles, which gives rise to the decreasing of aspect ratio at fluences between 0.625 J/cm 2 and 1 J/cm 2 . When we increase fluence higher a strong local electric field eventually destroys nanoparticles 15 29 similarly to their destruction by strong DC electric field 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our experimental conditions, one may expect the elongation of the nanoparticles caused by electrical forces at fluences above 0.625 J/cm 2 results in their partition with the formation of less elongated nanoparticles, which gives rise to the decreasing of aspect ratio at fluences between 0.625 J/cm 2 and 1 J/cm 2 . When we increase fluence higher a strong local electric field eventually destroys nanoparticles 15 29 similarly to their destruction by strong DC electric field 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%