2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12220-019-00237-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Squeezing Function and Fridman Invariants

Abstract: For a domain D ⊂ C n , the relationship between the squeezing function and the Fridman invariants is clarified. Furthermore, localization properties of these functions are obtained. As applications, some known results concerning their boundary behavior are extended.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Nikolov-Verma [20] have proved that s D (z) ≤ ẽD (z) ≤ e D (z). This still holds for the generalized squeezing function (cf.…”
Section: Squeezing Functions and Fridman Invariants Of Special Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Nikolov-Verma [20] have proved that s D (z) ≤ ẽD (z) ≤ e D (z). This still holds for the generalized squeezing function (cf.…”
Section: Squeezing Functions and Fridman Invariants Of Special Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have also been some studies on ẽD and e D (see e.g. [6,10,18,20]). For more details on various recent results, we refer the readers to the survey papers [7,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Fridman invariants and generalized squeezing functions are similar in spirit to the Kobayashi-Eisenman volume form K D and the Carathéodory volume form C D , respectively, it is natural to study the comparison of them. For this purpose, we will always assume that D is a bounded domain in C n and Ω is a bounded, balanced, convex and homogeneous domain in In [9], Nikolov and Verma have shown that m D (z) is always less than or equal to one. The next result shows that the same is true for m Ω D (z).…”
Section: Comparison Of Fridman Invariants and Generalized Squeezing F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In section 3, we study basic properties of generalized squeezing functions, in particular extending various properties of the squeezing function given in [1,2] to the more general setting. In section 4, we study the comparison of Fridman invariants and generalized squeezing functions, in particular generalizing previous results from [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By the decreasing property of the Kobayashi metric, it is obvious that s D ≤ e D for all bounded domains (see [28]). So as a corollary of Theorem 1.1, we get the main result of Diederich-Fornaess-Wold in [10] which says that, for a bounded strictly pseudocovnex domain D with C 2 boundary which is not biholomorphic to the unit ball, s D (z) ≤ Cδ(z) for some constant C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%