2004
DOI: 10.4064/aa115-4-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the square-free sieve

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to bound the cardinality of E(K, S) is to exploit the fact that, in a certain sense, the points of E(K, S) tend to be separated from each other. This idea is already present in [Sil6], [GS]; let us consider it in the manner of [He,§4]. After some modest slicing of E(K, S), we see that any two points on the same slice are separated by almost 60…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One way to bound the cardinality of E(K, S) is to exploit the fact that, in a certain sense, the points of E(K, S) tend to be separated from each other. This idea is already present in [Sil6], [GS]; let us consider it in the manner of [He,§4]. After some modest slicing of E(K, S), we see that any two points on the same slice are separated by almost 60…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, for the applications of Section 4, it is not difficult to avoid local heights completely: since we deal with the curves y 2 = x 3 +D, one may use the fact that they are all twists of y 2 = x 3 +1 to prove the required special cases of Proposition 3.4 and Theorem 3.8 in an elementary fashion (cf. [He,Lemma 4.16].…”
Section: Notation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note, finally, that every time we apply the inequality (2.9), the modulus m is not divisible by any exceptional moduli q > [Z 2 : L : L] < (log N ) α (as otherwise the result to be proven is trivial), we have that m is not divisible by any exceptional moduli q > C(log N ) 2α , where C is an absolute constant, and thus (2.9) is valid. and the ratio of this expression to (y|x)λ(xy(x − y)) can be handled by means of a square-free sieve ( [9], Prop. 3.12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and O f (N (log N ) −7/9 ) are smaller than those in [22], Thm. 5.1 (respectively, O f (N (log N ) −0.8061... ) and O f (N (log N ) −0.6829... )), which were, in turn, an improvement over the bound in [26], Ch.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%