1963
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(63)90092-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the spread of suppression and binocular rivalry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with that reported by Kaufman (1963). He found no binocular rivalry with stimulus exposures of 50 msec in duration.…”
Section: Simultaneity Threshold Tasksupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This finding is consistent with that reported by Kaufman (1963). He found no binocular rivalry with stimulus exposures of 50 msec in duration.…”
Section: Simultaneity Threshold Tasksupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Binocular rivalry between two optically stabilized images has been reported by Krauskopf and Riggs (1959) and Ditchburn and Pritchard (1960). Kaufman (1963) and Levelt (1965), using nonstabilized images, also found that rivalry depended on the relative positioning of the two images. However, none of these studies compared dichoptic results with monocular results in the same way as in the present afterimage study, and so it is impossible to compare the possible effect of orientation differences across studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…266 This is an almost identical description to that given by Kaufman (1963), who controlled the stimuli with more precision by using a strobe lamp. His rival display consisted of gratings of orthogonal lines illuminated for 50 msec at 2 Hz with a 21O,000-lx source.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%