Abstract:We consider the weighted digraphs in which the arc weights are positive definite matrices. We obtain some upper bounds for the spectral radius of these digraphs and characterize the digraphs achieving the upper bounds. Some known upper bounds are then special cases of our results.
“…, by directly calculating, we see that the bound of (2.1) is better than the bounds of (1.1)-(1.4) in [5] (see Table 1) because…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Then q(D 1 ) = 3 + √ 3 by Theorem 2.7. We can see from Table 1 that the bound of (2.1) is better than the bounds of (1.1)-(1.4) in [5] because q(…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Then we give a new sharp upper bound of the signless Laplacian spectral radius among all simple digraphs and compare them with the upper bounds given in [5] as inequalities (1.1)-(1.4). The technique used in the result is motivated by [8,17] et al By the definition of Q(D), the i-th row sum of Q(D) is 2d + i .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recently, R.A. Brualdi wrote a stimulating survey on the spectra of digraphs [4]. Furthermore, some upper or lower bounds on the spectral radius or the signless Laplacian spectral radius of digraphs were obtained by the outdegrees and the average 2outdegrees [5,8]. Some extremal digraphs which attain the maximum or minimum spectral radius and the distance spectral radius of digraphs with given parameters, such as given connectivity, given arc connectivity, given dichromatic number, given clique number, given girth and so on, were characterized, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5], S. Burcu Bozkurt and Durmus Bozkurt gave some sharp upper and lower bounds for the signless Laplacian spectral radius as follows:…”
Let D be a strongly connected digraph and A(D) be the adjacency matrix of D. Let diag(D) be the diagonal matrix with outdegrees of the vertices of D and Q(D) = diag(D) + A(D) be the signless Laplacian matrix of D. The spectral radius of Q(D) is called the signless Laplacian spectral radius of D, denoted by q(D). In this paper, we give sharp bound on q(D) with outdegree sequence and compare the bound with some known bounds, establish some sharp upper or lower bound on q(D) with some given parameter such as clique number, girth or vertex connectivity, and characterize the corresponding extremal digraph or proposed open problem. In addition, we also determine the unique digraph which achieves the minimum (or maximum), the second minimum (or maximum), the third minimum, the fourth minimum spectral radius and signless Laplacian spectral radius among all strongly connected digraphs, and answer the open problem proposed by Lin-Shu [H.Q. Lin, J.L. Shu, A note on the spectral characterization of strongly connected bicyclic digraphs, Linear Algebra Appl. 436 (2012) 2524-2530].
“…, by directly calculating, we see that the bound of (2.1) is better than the bounds of (1.1)-(1.4) in [5] (see Table 1) because…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Then q(D 1 ) = 3 + √ 3 by Theorem 2.7. We can see from Table 1 that the bound of (2.1) is better than the bounds of (1.1)-(1.4) in [5] because q(…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Then we give a new sharp upper bound of the signless Laplacian spectral radius among all simple digraphs and compare them with the upper bounds given in [5] as inequalities (1.1)-(1.4). The technique used in the result is motivated by [8,17] et al By the definition of Q(D), the i-th row sum of Q(D) is 2d + i .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recently, R.A. Brualdi wrote a stimulating survey on the spectra of digraphs [4]. Furthermore, some upper or lower bounds on the spectral radius or the signless Laplacian spectral radius of digraphs were obtained by the outdegrees and the average 2outdegrees [5,8]. Some extremal digraphs which attain the maximum or minimum spectral radius and the distance spectral radius of digraphs with given parameters, such as given connectivity, given arc connectivity, given dichromatic number, given clique number, given girth and so on, were characterized, see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5], S. Burcu Bozkurt and Durmus Bozkurt gave some sharp upper and lower bounds for the signless Laplacian spectral radius as follows:…”
Let D be a strongly connected digraph and A(D) be the adjacency matrix of D. Let diag(D) be the diagonal matrix with outdegrees of the vertices of D and Q(D) = diag(D) + A(D) be the signless Laplacian matrix of D. The spectral radius of Q(D) is called the signless Laplacian spectral radius of D, denoted by q(D). In this paper, we give sharp bound on q(D) with outdegree sequence and compare the bound with some known bounds, establish some sharp upper or lower bound on q(D) with some given parameter such as clique number, girth or vertex connectivity, and characterize the corresponding extremal digraph or proposed open problem. In addition, we also determine the unique digraph which achieves the minimum (or maximum), the second minimum (or maximum), the third minimum, the fourth minimum spectral radius and signless Laplacian spectral radius among all strongly connected digraphs, and answer the open problem proposed by Lin-Shu [H.Q. Lin, J.L. Shu, A note on the spectral characterization of strongly connected bicyclic digraphs, Linear Algebra Appl. 436 (2012) 2524-2530].
In this paper, we obtain a sharp upper bound for the spectral radius of a nonnegative matrix. This result is used to present upper bounds for the adjacency spectral radius, the Laplacian spectral radius, the signless Laplacian spectral radius, the distance spectral radius, the distance Laplacian spectral radius, the distance signless Laplacian spectral radius of a graph or a digraph. These results are new or generalize some known results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.