2015
DOI: 10.5802/slsedp.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the spectral instability of parallel shear flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See [29] for a case where linear inviscid damping does not hold for a monotone shear flow. See [39] for a spectral instability result. Nonlinear asymptotic stability for perturbations around a class of monotone shear flows, with compactly supported vorticity in T × [−1, 1], was recently proved by Ionescu-Jia [46] and Masmoudi-Zhao [58].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [29] for a case where linear inviscid damping does not hold for a monotone shear flow. See [39] for a spectral instability result. Nonlinear asymptotic stability for perturbations around a class of monotone shear flows, with compactly supported vorticity in T × [−1, 1], was recently proved by Ionescu-Jia [46] and Masmoudi-Zhao [58].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader should also see [2,11,34,54], [40,51,52] for related results. There have also been several works ( [17][18][19][20][21][22]25]) establishing generic invalidity of expansions of the type (1.6) in Sobolev spaces in the unsteady setting.…”
Section: Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for the monotonic and concave Prandtl boundary layer profiles, we may not expect the nonlinear stability of the Prandtl boundary layer in the Sobolev setting. In the notable work [14], the authors studied the linearized Navier--Stokes equations around generic stationary shear flows of the boundary layer type and constructed solutions with highly growing eigenmodes like e t/\nu 1 4 (\nu : viscosity) related to the O(\nu - 3 8 ) tangential frequency; see [13] for related statements and [16,18,19] for new progress. The result in [14] suggests somehow that one can only prove the validity of Prandtl boundary layer theory in the function spaces of Gevrey class, and recently there have been several interesting works in this direction; see [1,9,10].…”
Section: \Left\{mentioning
confidence: 99%