1994
DOI: 10.2307/2154640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Solvability of Systems of Inclusions Involving Noncompact Operators

Abstract: Abstract. We consider the solvability of a system y e F(x, y), x £ G(x, y) of set-valued maps in two different cases. In the first one, the map (x, y) -o F(x, y) is supposed to be closed graph with convex values and condensing in the second variable and (x, y)-o G(x, y) is supposed to be a permissible map (i.e. composition of an upper semicontinuous map with acyclic values and a continuous, single-valued map), satisfying a condensivity condition in the first variable. In the second case F is as before with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent development of the monotonicity method in the theory of differential-operator inclusions and evolution variational inequalities [4,11,12,15,19,20,[23][24][25]43,[62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] ensures resolvability of the given objects under the conditions of −-coercivity, boundedness and the generalized pseudomonotonicity (it is necessary to notice, that the proof is not constructive). With relation to applications it would be actual to weaken some conditions for multi-valued maps in problem (2) replacing −-coercivity by +-coercivity, boundedness by Condition (Π) and pseudomonotonicity in classical sense or generalized pseudomonotonicity by w λ 0 -pseudomonotonicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent development of the monotonicity method in the theory of differential-operator inclusions and evolution variational inequalities [4,11,12,15,19,20,[23][24][25]43,[62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] ensures resolvability of the given objects under the conditions of −-coercivity, boundedness and the generalized pseudomonotonicity (it is necessary to notice, that the proof is not constructive). With relation to applications it would be actual to weaken some conditions for multi-valued maps in problem (2) replacing −-coercivity by +-coercivity, boundedness by Condition (Π) and pseudomonotonicity in classical sense or generalized pseudomonotonicity by w λ 0 -pseudomonotonicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70]73,[79][80][81][82][83] and citations there). Similarly to differential-operator equations at...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when X = X , Y = Y and L 1 and L 2 are the identity operators on X and Y , respectively (see [5,6,21] where compact set-valued maps were considered and [9,26] where condensing maps were studied). Papers [5,21] and [26] use the technique of the so-called weighted maps, while [6] and [9] apply the homological tools rather. In Section 4 we show some applications, while in Appendix we recall basic notions from the cohomotopy theory and provide some technical arguments necessary in Section 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%