2004
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the sizes of stellar X-ray coronae

Abstract: Abstract. Spatial information from stellar X-ray coronae cannot be assessed directly, but scaling laws from the solar corona make it possible to estimate sizes of stellar coronae from the physical parameters temperature and density. While coronal plasma temperatures have long been available, we concentrate on the newly available density measurements from line fluxes of X-ray lines measured for a large sample of stellar coronae with the Chandra and XMM-Newton gratings. We compiled a set of 64 grating spectra of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
145
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(87 reference statements)
22
145
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The f /i ratio of the Ne ix triplet in IM Lup is statistically compatible at the 1σ level with the typical values of coronal sources (Ness et al 2004) at the low-density limit; however, a lower f /i value is allowed for IM Lup at the 90% confidence level due to the low count statistic. The low-density limit is also observed in WTTS (TWA 4 Kastner et al 2004; TWA 5 (Huenemoerder et al 2007) all show significant deviations from the low-density limit.…”
Section: Notes (A) Absorption Is Shown As Negative Valuessupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The f /i ratio of the Ne ix triplet in IM Lup is statistically compatible at the 1σ level with the typical values of coronal sources (Ness et al 2004) at the low-density limit; however, a lower f /i value is allowed for IM Lup at the 90% confidence level due to the low count statistic. The low-density limit is also observed in WTTS (TWA 4 Kastner et al 2004; TWA 5 (Huenemoerder et al 2007) all show significant deviations from the low-density limit.…”
Section: Notes (A) Absorption Is Shown As Negative Valuessupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Well-studied examples of young main-sequence (MS) stars such as AU Mic, Speedy Mic and AB Dor (Ness et al 2004) also show triplets indicating low densities similar to older MS objects. Five of 83 WTTS observed by Padgett et al (2006) show an IR-excess caused by dust within a few AU of the star, detected by Spitzer, thus there is a matter reservoir for accretion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the high X-ray luminosities of active MS stars and TTSs cannot be reproduced by simply filling the available coronal volume with solar-like active regions, coronal structures with higher plasma density 20 can explain the high levels of stellar X-ray activity. Evidence for higher than solar plasma densities is found in high-resolution X-ray and EUV spectra for many active stars (e.g., Sanz-Forcada et al 2003;Ness et al 2004). Furthermore, once the stellar coronae get nearly completely filled with active regions, the magnetic interaction of the active regions should lead to increased flaring in the most active stars, boosting their X-ray luminosities even further .…”
Section: X-ray Emission From Magnetic Star-disk Interactions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of the temperature sensitive O vii/O viii line ratio (tracing gas between 2 × 10 6 K and 4 × 10 6 K) suggest that as a group CTTs have larger amounts of cool gas than WTTs (Telleschi et al 2007a) as expected from the accretion shock. If the emission is due to post-shock gas, the density of this cool plasma should be larger in CTTs, compared to the same emission in naked atmospheres (∼ 10 9 cm −3 to ∼ 10 11 cm −3 , see Ness et al 2004). Observations of density-sensitive forbidden (for) and intercombination (int) lines of He-like ions (like Ne ixand O vii) reveal for/int values smaller than ∼ 0.5 in CTTs, suggesting plasma densities larger than ∼ 10 11 cm −3 (see for example Kastner et al in this volume, and references therein).…”
Section: X-rays From Shocksmentioning
confidence: 97%