2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1904.09560
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the size of subsets of $\mathbb{F}_p^{n}$ without $p$ distinct elements summing to zero

Abstract: Let us fix a prime p. The Erdős-Ginzburg-Ziv problem asks for the minimum integer s such that any collection of s points in the lattice Z n contains p points whose centroid is also a lattice point in Z n . For large n, this is essentially equivalent to asking for the maximum size of a subset of F n p without p distinct elements summing to zero. In this paper, we give a new upper bound for this problem for any fixed prime p ≥ 5 and large n. In particular, we prove that any subset of F n p without p distinct ele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the case where (⋆) consists only of one equation (i.e. in the case m = 1) this is a widely open problem, and in the special case of the equation x 1 + • • • + x p = 0 it has applications to bounding Erdős-Ginzburg-Ziv constants (see [9,21,24]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even in the case where (⋆) consists only of one equation (i.e. in the case m = 1) this is a widely open problem, and in the special case of the equation x 1 + • • • + x p = 0 it has applications to bounding Erdős-Ginzburg-Ziv constants (see [9,21,24]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the single equation x 1 + • • • + x p = 0, which is very closely related to the Erdős-Ginzburg-Ziv problem in discrete geometry, Naslund [21] proved a bound of the form |A| ≤ C p • (Γ p ) n for some Γ p between 0.84p and 0.92p (the constant C p was later improved in [9]). The best current bound in this case is |A| ≤ C p • (2 √ p) n due to the author [24]. In the case of a general single linear equation a…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us note that the opposite case when p is fixed and d is large is also of great interest. The current best bounds are s(F d 3 ) 2.756 d proved by Ellenberg-Gijswijt in their breakthrough paper [6] and s(F d p ) C p (2 √ p) d for p 5 due to Sauermann [17]. See [17] and references therein for an exposition of the existing results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current best bounds are s(F d 3 ) 2.756 d proved by Ellenberg-Gijswijt in their breakthrough paper [6] and s(F d p ) C p (2 √ p) d for p 5 due to Sauermann [17]. See [17] and references therein for an exposition of the existing results. Let us remark that the case p = 3 is also related to the famous cap set problem: 1 2 s(F d 3 ) equals to the maximal cardinality of a set A ⊂ F d 3 such that A does not contain any affine lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, x 2k+1 ) ∈ A 2k+1 of S * k . (Semishapes correspond to cycles in [Sau19].) We say it is degenerate if #{x 1 , x 2 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%