30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-2663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Simulation of Complex Gusts at Low Reynolds Numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancies can be justified b ased on the difference in t he Reynolds numbers. As discussed in Wong et al [2012] , the main difference between t he experimental and numerical data was found in the shear layer and wake where instabilities in the exp eriment (Re = 10000) were observed. In t he simulations, however, t he Reynolds number is sufficiently low (Re = 1600) to dampen out any instabilit ies.…”
Section: Validation Of Cfd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The discrepancies can be justified b ased on the difference in t he Reynolds numbers. As discussed in Wong et al [2012] , the main difference between t he experimental and numerical data was found in the shear layer and wake where instabilities in the exp eriment (Re = 10000) were observed. In t he simulations, however, t he Reynolds number is sufficiently low (Re = 1600) to dampen out any instabilit ies.…”
Section: Validation Of Cfd Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Chapter 3 discusses the numerical setup , which is used to produce a synthetic PIV velocity field. In addition, the numerical results presented in this study are validated with the experiments conducted by Wong et al [2012]. Chapter 4 provides the reader with the results obtained from the assessment of the DMT method.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the sake of boundary effect elimination, all the computational domain boundaries were placed about 20 c from the airfoil surface. To capture the correct transitional boundary layer, the nondimensional wall distance is kept less than one, y + < 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that recent studies have indicated that oscillation of the body instead of the oscillation of the freestream are not equivalent even at low frequencies. For the steady incident velocity, a uniform freestream ( U = U ∞ ) is considered, and for the unsteady freestream velocity, U ∞ = U mean . Both SOS and COS have the same frequency of oscillation, f , with the same reduced frequency ( k ), where kMathClass-rel=πitalicfcUMathClass-rel∞MathClass-punc.…”
Section: Simulated Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%