2012
DOI: 10.1029/2012ja017558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the signature of the quasi‐3‐day wave in the thermosphere during the January 2010 URSI World Day Campaign

Abstract: [1] Ultra-fast Kelvin waves with periods of 3-5 days are important in the coupling of the lower atmosphere to the thermosphere and ionosphere. Here we focus on the observations and effects of a 3-day wave during January 2010. As this time period coincides with a stratospheric warming event, a coordinated set of observations with incoherent scatter radars are available. While there is no evidence that the occurrence of this 3-day wave is connected with this event, these observations offer an unprecedented glimp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(106 reference statements)
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because it is well established from ground-based and satellite-borne measurements and modeling studies that the atmospheric tides strongly affect the MLT equatorial airglow and exhibit pronounced nocturnal variation (e.g., Shepherd et al, 1995;Yee et al, 1997;Takahashi et al, 1998). In addition, the tides can interact with other waves (e.g., Teitelbaum and Vial, 1991;Pancheva, 2001;England et al, 2012;Alves et al, 2013), leading to changes in their amplitudes and phases, which in turn could affect the airglow emissions. As there was a 1-day gap on 4 March in the airglow data, we take for this particular analysis the data from 5 to 14 March, which present excellent quality and continuity, and are still long enough to allow the study of the 3-4-day oscillations.…”
Section: Interaction Between the Ufkw And The Diurnal Tidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is because it is well established from ground-based and satellite-borne measurements and modeling studies that the atmospheric tides strongly affect the MLT equatorial airglow and exhibit pronounced nocturnal variation (e.g., Shepherd et al, 1995;Yee et al, 1997;Takahashi et al, 1998). In addition, the tides can interact with other waves (e.g., Teitelbaum and Vial, 1991;Pancheva, 2001;England et al, 2012;Alves et al, 2013), leading to changes in their amplitudes and phases, which in turn could affect the airglow emissions. As there was a 1-day gap on 4 March in the airglow data, we take for this particular analysis the data from 5 to 14 March, which present excellent quality and continuity, and are still long enough to allow the study of the 3-4-day oscillations.…”
Section: Interaction Between the Ufkw And The Diurnal Tidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as this, the amplitude of the tides are modulated in the periods of the planetary waves. Previous investigations of England et al (2012) using meteor radar, incoherent scatter radar and satellite wind data, along with satellite-borne temperature data, reported the evidence of the nonlinear interaction between the UFKW and the diurnal tide in the MLT and its effects in the E-region of the ionosphere. To investigate a possible interaction between the UFKW and atmospheric tides, we analyzed the amplitudes of the diurnal tide in the zonal and meridional wind during the presence of the 3-4-day UFKW in March.…”
Section: Interaction Between the Ufkw And The Diurnal Tidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although this study considers only the superposition of the UFK to the tidal waves at 120 km altitude the nonlinear interaction could still occur through the electrodynamical processes. England et al (2012) reported evidence of a nonlinear interaction between the UFK wave and the diurnal tides using the ground-based meteor radar at Thumba (8.5 • N, 77 • E) and the incoherent scatter radar at Arecibo (18 • N, 66 • W). The nonlinear interaction appeared to happen in altitudes from 82 to 88 km.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%