2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40870-016-0055-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Shock Response of Polymers to Extreme Loading

Abstract: This paper reviews polymer response to shock and discusses how plastics behave differently depending on the strain rate applied. The author uses polyethylene, polytetrafluroethylene, polycarbonate and epoxy as example materials. It is suggested that there are two distinct regimes of polymer response corresponding to low and high shock pressures (weak and strong shock regimes) that must be considered separately. Above a high pressure threshold it is proposed that polymers homogenize to carbon-containing structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, above the particle velocity of ca. 0.2 mm/μs, as recorded in this experiment, most polymeric materials give a linear response, of the form U s = C o + SU p , along with other commercially available polymers and specially produced plastics [9]. The empirical constants C 0 and S in the linear and polymeric best-fit equations are related to the bulk sound speed (in metals such as copper) [27] and the rate of change of compressibility of the material with pressure [9], respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, above the particle velocity of ca. 0.2 mm/μs, as recorded in this experiment, most polymeric materials give a linear response, of the form U s = C o + SU p , along with other commercially available polymers and specially produced plastics [9]. The empirical constants C 0 and S in the linear and polymeric best-fit equations are related to the bulk sound speed (in metals such as copper) [27] and the rate of change of compressibility of the material with pressure [9], respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…0.2 mm/μs, as recorded in this experiment, most polymeric materials give a linear response, of the form U s = C o + SU p , along with other commercially available polymers and specially produced plastics [9]. The empirical constants C 0 and S in the linear and polymeric best-fit equations are related to the bulk sound speed (in metals such as copper) [27] and the rate of change of compressibility of the material with pressure [9], respectively. More striking, and in line with other polymeric materials such as PMMA, and polycarbonate [8], is the failure of the experimental data to extrapolate to the zero-pressure ultrasonic measurement as observed in metals.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where m and v o are mass and velocity of the striker. Polymeric materials are known to absorb energy during impact and dynamic loadings which leads to their usage in different areas [56][57][58]. Bakelite is a polymer categorized as a thermoset plastic and elastic modulus of polymers generally lies in the range of 3450 MPa [59] which is less than elastic constant for cement.…”
Section: Formulation Of Electric Dipole Under Impact Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The journal is highly international, publishing experimental and theoretical studies of metals [57], polymers [58], glasses [59], composites [60], granular materials [61], explosives [62], biological materials [63], geological materials [64], phase transitions [65], and structural response [66]. The journal includes application and development of techniques including split Hopkinson pressure bar/Kolsky bar [67], plate impact with light gas guns and powder guns [68], Taylor Anvil [69], Dynamic-TensileExtrusion [70], spectroscopy-and pyrometry-based shock temperature measurements [71], optical and X-ray imaging methods [72], interferometry and velocimetry techniques [73], dynamic fracture [74], laser based dynamic drivers [75], penetration and ballistics [76], equation of state [77], and spall failure [78].…”
Section: Members Of the Photoelasticity Conference And Guestsmentioning
confidence: 99%