7th Fluid and PlasmaDynamics Conference 1974
DOI: 10.2514/6.1974-524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the shock-on-shock interaction problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Merritt & Aronson (1966) and Merritt & Aronson (1967) studied the head-on interaction of a flying supersonic model of a hemisphere-cylinder, right circular cylinder, 60 • wedge and 9 • half-angle cone. Numerical simulations for shock-on-shock interaction are given by Kutler, Sakell & Aiello (1974 and , using a second-order, shock-capturing, finite-difference approach. Li & Ben-Dor (1997) presented a more general model based on two-and three-shock theories and classified shock-on-shock interaction into regular and irregular interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merritt & Aronson (1966) and Merritt & Aronson (1967) studied the head-on interaction of a flying supersonic model of a hemisphere-cylinder, right circular cylinder, 60 • wedge and 9 • half-angle cone. Numerical simulations for shock-on-shock interaction are given by Kutler, Sakell & Aiello (1974 and , using a second-order, shock-capturing, finite-difference approach. Li & Ben-Dor (1997) presented a more general model based on two-and three-shock theories and classified shock-on-shock interaction into regular and irregular interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 ' 9 ' 14 This paper does not try to summarize them by commenting on the relative merits or shortcomings of each, rather the reader is referred to papers by Aiello, 15 and Kutler et al 9 for brief summaries of some of the existing theories. In general, most of the early theories required assumptions regarding the position and structure of the existing shock waves for their model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%