1993
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/265.4.1013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the shape of the light profiles of early-type galaxies

Abstract: We have obtained the best t to the light pro les of a luminosity limited sample of elliptical and S0 galaxies with a power law r 1=n , letting the exponent remain free rather than keeping it xed at 1=n = 1=4 as in the well known de Vaucouleurs formula. The introduction of a free parameter in the tting formula (ranging from n = 0:5 for hr e i = 0:3 kpc to n = 16 for hr e i = 25 kpc) is justi ed by the existence of a good correlation between n and the global galaxian parameters, such as total luminosity and scal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

71
927
4
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 661 publications
(1,005 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
71
927
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…where μ e is the surface brightness at the effective radius R e that encloses half of the total light from the model [43,44]. The constant b n is defined in terms of the parameter n, which described the overall shape of the light profile.…”
Section: The Baryonic Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where μ e is the surface brightness at the effective radius R e that encloses half of the total light from the model [43,44]. The constant b n is defined in terms of the parameter n, which described the overall shape of the light profile.…”
Section: The Baryonic Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with c n = 2.5(0.868n − 0.142) (valid for 0.5 < n < 16.5; Caon et al 1993). The fit was made from that particular radius, chosen by eye, where the, sometimes visible, inner plateau, will not disturb the fit.…”
Section: Global Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seemed a sensible approach a few decades ago, when the technique was used to quantify the sizes of elliptical galaxies, which were thought to be all well described by homologous R 1/4 de Vaucouleurs (1948) surface-brightness profiles. But we now know that ETGs are best represented by Sersic (1968) profiles, with concentration that systematically increases with galaxy mass (Caon et al 1993). Moreover the ATLAS 3D volume-limited (M > 6×10 9 M ) survey of nearby ETGs (Cappellari et al 2011a) has revealed that the majority of the systems are more closely related to spiral galaxies than to genuine spheroidal ellipticals (Cappellari et al 2011b).…”
Section: Uncertainties Of Galaxy Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%