2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the shape of effective inclusion in the Maxwell homogenization scheme for anisotropic elastic composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Giraud and Sevostianov [19] used Maxwell scheme to calculate the effective elastic properties of a material containing randomly oriented concave superspherical pores. In the case of randomly oriented spheroids [11,20] …”
Section: Isotropic Distribution Of Identical Inhomogeneitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Giraud and Sevostianov [19] used Maxwell scheme to calculate the effective elastic properties of a material containing randomly oriented concave superspherical pores. In the case of randomly oriented spheroids [11,20] …”
Section: Isotropic Distribution Of Identical Inhomogeneitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors discussed the uncertainty related to the shape of the effective inclusion but did not provide explicit recommendations regarding the choice of the shape in the general case. Sevostianov (2014) explicitly formulated the hypotheses that allow one to evaluate the shape of the effective inclusion. Kushch, Mogilevskaya, Stolarski, and Crouch (2012) verified these hypotheses numerically and illustrate, on simple examples, that approach proposed by Sevostianov (2014) allows one to optimize Maxwell's scheme.…”
Section: Maxwell Homogenization Scheme In Terms Of Property Contributmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approach developed by Sevostianov and Giraud (2013) and Sevostianov (2014) allows one to make this step. To obtain closed formulas, one has to know explicit expression for compliance contribution tensor of an inhomogeneity embedded in the anisotropic matrix.…”
Section: Maxwell Homogenization Scheme In Terms Of Property Contributmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Actually, the shrinkage porosity defects distributed irregularly in castings [1,11,17,18] , which means their configurations were intangible, and their shapes and spatial positions in casting were also somewhat different. Because of this inhomogeneous and random characteristic, the mechanical performances of castings with shrinkage porosity were uncertain [19,20] . Moreover, the crack growth behaviors were correlated with the probability distributions, such as the number (defect density), size, and location of defects [21,22] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%